passed5More than years of negotiations, the United States,Japan、Australia、Canada、Mexico、Vietnam、Malaysiaetc.12countries in2015Year10MonthlyTPPAgreement reached. The members of this w88 agreement cover the world40%’s economic output, the agreement includes investment, services, e-commerce, government procurement, intellectual property, state-owned enterprises, labor, environment, etc.30chapters.TPPAgreementIt is the largest free w88 agreement with a wide span, covering both developed and developing countries. againstTPPThe changes brought by the agreement to the two major economies of China and the United States,Professor Zhao Zhongxiu, Vice President of w88 casinoYu2month4On the "Phoenix Global Connection", I was interviewed by Phoenix TV and answered a series of related questions.

Moderator: American think tank research believes thatTTPAfter the agreement is signed, the United States will be the biggest beneficiary and will not participateTPPChina will suffer approx.18% of income loss, how you personally feelTPP15983_16005TPPis open to joining, so what are the risks and considerations after joining?

Zhao Zhongxiu: What American think tanks claim China will suffer18% losses are exaggerated becauseTPPFor China, it is just an option and one of many free w88 agreements. In fact, China and the United States are also negotiating a bilateral investment agreement. Sino-US economic and w88 cooperation relations are still relatively stable, not to say thatTPPIt will exclude China. The economic strength, mutual needs and markets between China and the United States are the most important determinants of the economic and w88 cooperation between the two countries. China vs.TPPWe have an open attitude, including our independent promotion of the construction of free w88 zones. China is building an open economic system and is also promotingRCEPThe construction, so, should be seen,2014The Asia-Pacific Free w88 Area advocated in Beijing is an agreement that is more balanced, more open, takes into account the actual conditions of member states, and is more effective. So, eitherTPPorRCEPNo matter what, it is just a transition and cannot achieve what is now achieved by the twelve countriesTPPThe agreement is viewed as the ultimate goal. For China, there is still a lot of room for us to play.

Moderator:TPPThe regional division of the agreement focuses on the Asia-Pacific region. Whether it is the U.S. w88 representative or U.S. President Obama, they always talk about directly opposing China, emphasizing that21Whether the United States or China will dominate the Asia-Pacific region in this century is a multiple-choice question.TPPIs there really a squeeze on China during the signing of the agreement? Is this an alternative between two future development models? What do you think of this politicization trend?

Zhao Zhongxiu：TPP24163_2418221The rule-making and dominance of the century is obvious to the United States. The harmonization of the global trading system has trapped the hands of the United States. As in the past, the United States can no longer set standards and other countries implement them, so what should we do? Start anew. With the help of the original free w88 agreement between the four countries, many contents not covered by the current multilateral trading system have been added to it. In a sense,TPPIt is based on the interests of the United States. After the financial crisis, the United States wanted to regain its economic competitiveness, especially to promote employment and represent the interests of large companies, so it seized the power to set such a standard in its hands, highlighting its status as a latecomer. This also includes formulating rules and asking other countries, including China, to accept the meaning of these rules, which is somewhat like an alliance under the city. However, international economic relations are intricate and ultimately depend on the needs and strengths of each country. inTPPAt the same time, the United States and the European Union are also talking, China and the European Union are also talking, and the United States and China are also talking. This has formed a rules-based Warring States period, rather than a situation dominated by China or the United States. Therefore, we must look at the formulation of rules with an open mind. This process may take a long time, ten or twenty years, to form an economic system that is recognized by the whole world. Everything is still on the way, and it is too early to draw conclusions now.

Host: China-ledRCEPled by the United StatesTPPThere are many overlapping countries in China. How do you view the competition and cooperation between the two countries in this region? What competitive advantages and differences do each have after overlapping?

Zhao Zhongxiu: It should be saidTPPandRCEPThere are high and low standards, relatively speakingTPP29800_29850RCEP30222_3025010+3;Finally add Australia, New Zealand and India, this is called10+6. It can be seen thatRCEPReflects the objective situation of the Asia-Pacific West Coast economies. From the perspective of rules, the rules themselves are consistent, but the standards vary from high to low, which includes considerations of convergence. From the perspective of the United States, the intention is to hang the standards high and let everyone pick their own toes to reach them, but this does not conform to the reality of various countries. Some countries may get temporary benefits, but unsustainable negative effects caused by premature maturity will also follow. We should all view the benefits and possible negative impacts of economic agreements at different levels with a constructive and open attitude, and ultimately seek common ground while reserving differences to truly promote the development of regional cooperation, rather than in the standardization camp. The standardization camp is actually a closed and oppositional thinking. Practice has proved that this kind of thinking is not sustainable for a long time.