The United States has initially ruled that our containers are dumped

11month20On August 8881_8907|, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued a statement preliminarily identifying China’s exports to the United States53There is dumping behavior of foot dry cargo containers, and the dumping margin is from24.27%To153.24%. Industry experts interviewed by reporters from International Business Daily believe that the key to this case lies in whether the raw material prices of container companies are really lower than market prices. At the same time, experts suggest that before the final ruling comes, Chinese companies should respond actively and safeguard their due rights.

The process is complicated and the outcome is unpredictable

Chen Weidong, Professor of Law w88 casino of w88 casinotold a reporter from the International Business Daily that in the w88 relationship between China and the United States, the United States’ implementation of “double counterfeiting” on products exported from China to the United States has become an important part.

The Ministry of Commerce of China has also stated on many occasions that it hopes the U.S. government will abide by its commitment to oppose w88 protectionism, jointly maintain a free, open, and fair international w88 environment, and properly handle w88 frictions in a more rational way.

Chen Weidongsaid that judging from the past "double-reverse" cases between China and the United States, they involve many key issues in the "double-reverse" measures taken by the United States against Chinese products, including whether my country's state-owned enterprises and state-owned commercial banks can serve as providers of subsidies. In these cases, the demands of Chinese enterprises on subsidies and countervailing regulations have been supported by the WTO expert group. However, on issues such as specificity and external benchmarks, some of my country's demands have not been supported.

“The process of safeguarding rights is very difficult. This is mainly because the investigation process of such cases is complicated and takes a long time.”Chen Weidongsaid, “In cases involving ‘double counterfeiting’ issues, we must clarify the identification of subsidy providers. Specific to this container case, we must first identify the state-owned steel companies that provide steel and other raw materials to container companies. Is the price of the raw materials provided really lower than the market price? The U.S. Department of Commerce will determine whether subsidies exist based on this price. "In addition, the U.S. Department of Commerce has some common practices, and they are constantly adjusting these practices, such as in the determination of public institutions. Therefore, whether the United States will adopt adjusted methods to investigate this container case remains to be further observed by Chinese companies. Finally, Chen Weidong pointed out that the government's efforts are only one aspect, and the final result is also related to the attitude of relevant Chinese companies.

Chinese enterprises should respond positively

According to U.S. procedures, the U.S. Department of Commerce and the International w88 Commission will meet next year respectively4Yuehe5The final ruling on the above investigation was made in March. If both agencies make an affirmative final determination that such products imported from China cause substantial damage or threaten related industries in the United States, the U.S. Department of Commerce will require the Customs to impose anti-dumping and countervailing duties on the relevant products. According to the U.S. Department of Commerce,2013The amount of such products imported by the United States from China was1.84Billion US dollars.

“The preliminary ruling results will not have a significant impact on my country’s relevant container companies.” Liang Yanfen, director and researcher of the World Economic and w88 Research Department of the Ministry of Commerce Research Institute, told the International Business Daily reporter, “But it also gives these companies a ‘ Warning’. Chinese companies should actively respond to the preliminary ruling within the prescribed time. Only in this way can they obtain room for mediation. Otherwise, if the final ruling remains the same, it will have a direct impact on the company’s exports.”

Chen Weidongalso said that during the period from preliminary ruling to final ruling, the two sides may also reach price commitments and intergovernmental commitments, which also gives both parties room for negotiation. "Therefore, the Chinese government and enterprises should actively exercise their rights in dealing with the investigation of 'double-reverse anti-dumping'. In addition, they should also be prepared to deal with an affirmative final ruling."Chen WeidongSay.

Original report link:http://epaper.comnews.cn/news-1086472.html