2014China Antitrust Civil w88 sports betting Forum was successfully held in Beijing
(Source: People's Daily Online2014-5-28）
byCompetition Law Center of w88 casino、ICTCo-sponsored by the Industrial Competition Laboratory and supported by the Intellectual Property Division of the Supreme People's Court"2014China Antitrust Civil w88 sports betting Forum” in2014Year5month24To25It was held grandly at the Changfu Palace Hotel in Beijing on the 8594_8610th.
From the Supreme People's Court and the higher and intermediate people's courts of Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Fujian, Shandong, Hubei, Hunan, Guangdong and other provinces and cities30Judge Yu, senior judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia CircuitDouglas H. GINSBURG, Commissioner of the United States Federal w88 CommissionMaureen K. OHLHAUSEN, Deputy Assistant Attorney General of the United StatesLeslie C. OVERTON, Economic Advisor to the U.S. Federal w88 CommissionJoanna TSAI, professor at George Washington Law w88 casino and internationally renowned competition law expertWilliam KovacicAnd other professionals in total200More people attended this forum.
At the two-day meeting, judges, scholars and lawyers from China and the United States conducted professional exchanges on professional issues in antitrust civil w88 sports betting and typical antitrust w88 sports betting cases at home and abroad. In four open roundtable forums, the speakers actively interacted and discussed "antitrust judicial regulation of vertical restrictions", "antitrust regulation of intellectual property rights", and "most favored nation treatment clauses" from legal, economic, social and other perspectives.MFN)” and other related issues were discussed in depth.
Anti-monopoly civil w88 sports betting and administrative enforcement are two forms of relief stipulated in my country’s Anti-Monopoly Law. With the normalization of administrative enforcement and the increase in the number of civil w88 sports betting cases, the connection between the two has attracted much attention from society. inProfessor Huang Yong, Director of the Competition Law Center of the w88 casino10370_105512013At the end of the year, the court system accepted a total of cases188Anti-monopoly civil cases, concluded172pieces, accepted last year71Case, concluded69pieces, an increase from the previous year30%. The relationship between administrative law enforcement and court w88 sports betting should be cooperation, coordination and supervision. In addition, with the pilot of three-in-one intellectual property civil, criminal and administrative cases, in the future anti-monopoly civil and administrative w88 sports betting may be accepted by the intellectual property tribunal, which will facilitate the connection between anti-monopoly private w88 sports betting and administrative law enforcement. Director Yang Jie said that my country's current anti-monopoly law implementation mechanism is that private w88 sports betting and administrative enforcement go hand in hand. Administrative agencies respect the supervision of the courts, and the administrative agencies themselves will also improve administrative enforcement through internal supervision mechanisms. The host, Professor Huang Yong, said in his summary that there may be overlap or even conflict between administrative law enforcement and antitrust civil w88 sports betting in the future. We need to uphold the concept of the rule of law, pay attention to the supervision function of the courts, prevent the abuse of administrative power, and truly realize the dominance of the market economy and the correct implementation of competition policies.
An in-depth discussion of the professionalism of antitrust civil w88 sports betting is another highlight of this forum. The guests discussed specific issues such as the application of economic analysis in the trial of antitrust cases and due process in antitrust civil w88 sports betting.Joanna TSAIBased on specific cases, Ms. 11370_11413|Ms. gave a detailed introduction to the status, role and application methods of economic analysis in antitrust w88 sports betting.Douglas H. GINSBURGThe judge pointed out that in w88 sports betting procedures, attention needs to be paid to issues such as overcoming procedural delays, maintaining the neutrality and independence of the adjudicator, and protecting the parties’ right to cross-examination.
byCompetition Law Center of w88 casinoorganized in cooperation with the Supreme People's Court"2014Anti-Monopoly Civil w88 sports betting Forum” is in its fourth session. As the forum’s organizational model becomes increasingly mature and its social influence gradually increases, the forum’s advantages of wide participation, interdisciplinary discussions, face-to-face communication between China and foreign countries, and the simultaneous development of judicial theory and practice have become increasingly obvious.“Antitrust Civil w88 sports betting Forum”It has become a high-end international exchange platform for antitrust civil w88 sports betting and law enforcement. It has made significant contributions to enhancing the status of competition policy in my country's economic policy and promoting the country's economic transformation and economic development.
Attached report link:
http://theory.people.com.cn/n/2014/0528/c40534-25076325.html
