Huang Yong: Not only deregulation, but also promotion of competition
(Source: CPPCC National Committee Date:2013Year12month3日）
Reporter Chen JianpingThe Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee proposed that “the relationship between the government and the market should be properly handled so that the market plays a decisive role in resource allocation. "at12month1At the 5th Beijing Democratic Construction Non-public Economic Legal Seminar held on the 8556_8580th day,Huang Yong, professor at the w88 casino Law w88 casino, deputy leader of the Expert Advisory Group of the Anti-Monopoly Committee of the State Council, and director of the Beijing Civil Construction and Legal Affairs CommitteeThe understanding of this is that "the key to the success of my country's economic transformation is to further realize economic marketization and market competition, not only deregulation, but also the selection of new policy priorities after deregulation. In the long run, direct intervention in the economy through industrial policy should be gradually weakened, and competition policy should be regarded as the basic economic policy in the field of market economy."
Huang Yongtold reporters, "In government documents, newspapers and magazines, we often see a familiar term - industrial policy, which is different from the basic economic policies common to all countries in the world such as fiscal, monetary, financial, w88, etc. This is the biggest difference in the dominant economic policies between us as a country in transition and mature Western market economy countries. ”Huang Yong thinks, In the early stages of development, my country took speed and catching up as its primary goals, and could achieve certain economic development goals through the adjustment of industrial policies. As economic development moves from the catching-up stage to normal operation, many drawbacks of industrial policies have become increasingly apparent. "Industrial policies are often short-term or time-limited, and are government-led, with mostly administrative means; while competition means are long-term mechanisms, which are market-oriented and operate according to market rules. There is a significant and substantial difference between the two. ”Huang YongDoes not mince words, "The photovoltaic industry is the most typical example. Why do entrepreneurs rush to get projects as soon as a certain industrial policy comes out? Because there are government subsidies, bank loans, and various policy supports. If an entrepreneur devotes himself to an emerging industry and spends most of his energy not studying the market but asking the government for money, sooner or later there will be problems in this industry."
Huang Yong said, "The leading role of the government should never be to provide special products for specific groups of operators, but to provide public goods such as an excellent market environment with market competition mechanisms as the core." What makes Huang Yong happy is that when he participated in the China-EU Competition Policy Dialogue recently, he found that the level of attention has shifted from specific implementation to policy design. "There are two topics for discussion proposed by the National Development and Reform Commission this year, one is the state aid system, and the other is the economy of general economic interests. The issue of compensation services means that competition policy must become an important goal and basis for the government to formulate policies. The government must consider whether it is consistent with competition policy when formulating other policies and whether it is conducive to the formation and maintenance of competition mechanisms. This is the basic status of competition policy. "At present, competition policy is on the margins of the entire official economic policy tool set. In the process of managing the economy, the government is still accustomed to launching industrial policies that are regarded as a panacea to promote China's economic development, butHuang YongBut he is full of confidence, "No one can stop the power of the market. As people's understanding of the market deepens, competition policy plays an irreplaceable role in ensuring and improving the market economic order. As the focus of the government's next work, the government should upgrade competition policy to my country's basic economic policy, so as to cultivate a good domestic competition environment, enable good companies to stand out from the competition, and have strong competitiveness to participate in fierce international competition."
The Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee also proposed that building a unified, open and competitive market system is the basis for the market to play a decisive role in resource allocation. In this regard,Huang Yong's view is, "197912193_12385
Huang YongExplanation: Administrative monopoly is the behavior of administrative agencies that exceed their legal authority in exercising administrative power. The most prominent manifestation is the regional blockade implemented by local governments, which further distorts and eliminates competition on the basis of economic monopoly. As a result, the best cannot win, the worst cannot be eliminated, and social resources cannot be reasonably optimally allocated. "As the most important legal tool for competition policy, the Anti-Monopoly Law has prohibitive provisions on the abuse of administrative power to eliminate or restrict competition. The special chapter on administrative monopoly is one of the distinguishing features of China's anti-monopoly law that is different from that of mature market economy countries. The Anti-Monopoly Law authorizes anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies to investigate, identify violations, publicly expose, and even recommend that higher-level supervisory agencies punish relevant government officials."Huang YongReflected question, "Why not seek solutions to the problem within the existing legal framework? This special arrangement of legislation shows the particularity and importance of the administrative monopoly issue in China. The specific handling of each case can continuously promote social awareness and progress."
Huang YongFinally, it was stated that the Third Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China put forward new expectations for competition policy. To deepen my country's marketization and optimize the growth environment for non-public economic enterprises, the comprehensive strength, law enforcement professionalism and staffing of existing anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies should be strengthened to coordinate competition policies and industries. policies and w88 policies, and timely merge the three anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies into a unified, relatively independent, professional and authoritative law enforcement agency. Ultimately, by ensuring a fair and free competitive environment, we will promote the optimal allocation of resources and the continuous innovation of market entities, and contribute to the well-being of the entire society and consumers.
Attachment: Original report link
http://epaper.rmzxb.com.cn/2013/20131203/t20131203_524991.htm
Reprinted by the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference News Network
http://cppcc.people.com.cn/n/2013/1203/c34948-23721418.html
