Blocking Chinese companies is intended to maintain hegemony

Feng Pengcheng

　(Source: Guangming.com-"Guangming Daily"2012Year10month15Japanese version 8)

In the past ten years, with the increasing development of China's economy and the increasing strength of Chinese enterprises, the United States has greatly increased its "attention" to Chinese enterprises. It has adopted a series of sanctions against Chinese enterprises in terms of product exports and foreign direct investment in the United States, and has even blocked Chinese enterprises.

Statistics from the U.S. International w88 Commission show that in the 25 years since Chinese companies encountered the first "337 investigation" case in 1986, Chinese companies have been subject to 126 "337 investigations" in the United States, of which more than 93% were patent cases. Since 2002, China has been the country that has encountered the largest number of cases under the United States’ “Section 337 investigation” for 10 consecutive years. According to the U.S. Tariff Act of 1930, an independent quasi-judicial federal agency in the United States: the International w88 Commission can initiate a quasi-judicial investigation into unfair practices in import w88 and take sanctions.

The United States implements "double-reverse" measures against Chinese high-tech enterprises in the name of "fair w88". These measures are not as intensive as the "337" provisions, but they are very targeted and have a demonstration effect. For example, last year, the American company "Sun World" and six other companies filed a complaint with the U.S. International w88 Commission and the U.S. Department of Commerce, requesting anti-dumping and countervailing investigations on solar panels exported from China and imposing a 100% tax rate. Shortly after the preliminary ruling of the U.S. investigation, the European Union, a market that accounts for 70% of China's photovoltaic product exports, officially launched an anti-dumping investigation against China, involving more than US$20 billion. On October 10, local time in the United States, the U.S. Department of Commerce made a final ruling that China’s crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells and modules exported to the United States were dumped and subsidized. This basically cleared the way for the United States to impose anti-dumping and countervailing duties on such products. According to the U.S. w88 remedy procedures, the case requires the U.S. International w88 Commission to make a final ruling around November 23 this year.

Resist Chinese technology companies from further entering the US market on the grounds of so-called "national security" and protect their own industries. For example, in March 2006, after Lenovo acquired IBM's PC department, it obtained an order to provide more than 16,000 desktop computers and related equipment to the U.S. State Department, which was considered a threat to national security; in 2008, Huawei was forced to abandon the acquisition of 3COM; 20 In 2008, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States blocked the joint acquisition of 3COM by Huawei and Bain Capital on the grounds of "security concerns"; in November 2010, considering the US government's concerns about national security, Sprint, the third largest operator in the United States, Nextel's US$5 billion network bidding eliminated both Huawei and ZTE; in 2010, the United States refused to approve Huawei's bid for 2Wire and Motorola's mobile network division; in 2011, Huawei's acquisition of technology company 3Leaf was also ordered to stop at the last minute. Huawei was notified in 2011 that the United States had excluded it from a tender intended to help the United States build a national emergency response wireless network due to security concerns. In October 2011, the U.S. "National Security Team" rejected China Mobile's application to develop long-distance phone services and build communication facilities in the United States on the grounds of "suspected intelligence espionage." On September 13 this year, the United States once again launched a new round of hearings on Huawei and ZTE on the grounds of "national security."

Over the years, the United States has never stopped attacking high-tech companies in other countries, especially China. Although there are many ways to attack, the logic behind them has never left the main line of serving national strategy. Its purpose is to ensure the leadership of the United States, safeguard the national security of the United States, promote the economic prosperity of the United States, and ensure the world hegemony of the United States.

(Author Feng Pengcheng Unit: Institute of International Economics, w88 casino)

Original link:

International perspective: Blocking Chinese companies is intended to maintain hegemony

http://world.gmw.cn/2012-10/15/content_5360513.htm

Related report links:

1、Accepted an interview with Xinhua News Agency reporter on the phenomenon that Western countries led by the United States have adopted a series of sanctions against Chinese companies in terms of product exports and foreign direct investment, and even blocked Chinese companies.

《Another “antitrust” lawsuit has become the norm for Chinese companies going global to “be noticed”》

http://news.163.com/12/1017/15/8E1F27HV00014JB5.html

2、Interviewed by a reporter from the Global Times regarding the Icelandic government's rejection of Zhongkun Group Chairman Huang Nubo's request to purchase land in Iceland to build resort facilities.

Chinese firm to sign land deal：

http://www.globaltimes.cn/NEWS/tabid/99/ID/738510/Chinese-firm-to-sign-land-deal.aspx