w88 casino News Network (Reporter Zhang Xian Zeng Xin Huang Wei)4month15Day,2007The preliminary rounds of the Capital University Economic and w88 Debate Competition were held in w88 casino, with a total of three rounds. The first match was between Peking University and Renmin University of China, and the topic of the debate was "Should universities focus on scientific research or education?"; the second match was between Central University of Finance and Economics and Beijing Normal University, and the title of the debate was "Who plays a more important role in eradicating piracy, the government or consumers?"; the third match was between Beijing Jiaotong University and Capital University of Economics and Business, and the title of the debate was "Whether vigorously accelerating the process of urbanization does more good than harm or does more harm than good?”
The duel between Peking University and Renmin University of China in the morning10Click to start. Zheng Fang Yibian from Peking University was the only male member of the team. He first made an opening statement with an aggressive yet elegant demeanor. The first debater from Renmin University of China introduced the social role of universities in an elegant and gentle tone, proposing that "universities should focus on education." The first debate speeches of both sides opened the prelude to a wonderful war of words.
The second stage is one-on-one attack. At this stage, the debaters’ talents and eloquence were most vividly displayed. The two sides debated the purpose of universities, whether education is fair, and the phenomenon of emphasis on scientific research over teaching in today's universities. The debaters' wonderful speeches frequently won rounds of applause from the students present. During the free debate session, we witnessed the collision of ideas between Peking University and the National People's Congress, and the debaters' witty remarks pushed the atmosphere to a climax.
The audience question period will then come. The audience present asked questions to either debater on the debate topic. The students raised some practical issues related to university education that are related to the vital interests of college students. The debaters answered one by one. The interaction on and off the court created a great atmosphere for the game.
The last stage of the competition is the closing speech. First, we will summarize from the four arguments of the opposite side. He elaborated that university education is not only the education of knowledge, but also the cultivation of people's ideological and moral ethics, and pointed out that universities should be "people-oriented". Then the four arguments of the square are summarized. She advocated looking at problems from a developmental perspective and suggested that universities would eventually shift from focusing on education to focusing on scientific research. A clear, logical and powerful summary speech brought the entire game to a perfect end.
The winner of this game is Peking University. The best debater was Tang Yifan from Renmin University of China.
Debate Team of Renmin University of China
Peking University Debate Team
Afternoon3The showdown between Central University of Finance and Economics and Beijing Normal University was held. First, Geng Xia, a critic from the Central University of Finance and Economics, stated his point of view: the government plays a more important role in preventing piracy. Later, Zhao Dapeng, a critic from Beijing Normal University, also stated the opposition's point of view: consumers should play a more important role in preventing piracy.
The following stage of attack and free debate were very intense. The debaters faced each other tit for tat, and their wonderful words often hit the mark, winning applause from the audience. After the free debate, the debaters answered questions from the audience.
After the final summary speech stage, the judges and teachers commented on today’s competition, affirming the advantages of both parties, and also pointed out some shortcomings. Finally, the chairman announced that the winner of this competition was the Central University of Finance and Economics, and the best debater was Zhang Yinpeng from Beijing Normal University, the opponent.
Beijing Normal University Debate Team
Central University of Finance and Economics Debate Team
Night7The match between Beijing Jiaotong University and Capital University of Economics and Business starts on time. First, let both parties distinguish and use them separately3Minutes to speak. On the positive side, Yi Bian from Capital University of Economics and Business used fluent language to explain the positive point of view - vigorously accelerating the process of urbanization will do more harm than good; on the other side, Yi Bian from Beijing Jiaotong University used logical language to put forward the negative side - vigorously accelerating the process of urbanization will do more harm than good. What followed was a tense debate session. The two sides had a heated debate on the impact of urbanization on society. The debaters' wonderful performance amazed the audience. The most intense part of the entire debate was the free debate stage. The smart answers and humorous language of the debaters from both sides won bursts of applause from the audience. After the intense free debate, the moderator left time for the audience to ask questions to the debaters on both sides. The debaters' logical thinking and flexible adaptability were once again displayed in front of the audience, and the audience continued to applaud. Then, the two sides made their concluding speeches. Their sonorous and powerful arguments and rich body language impressed the audience again.
Subsequently, judges from Peking UniversityCuiThe professor commented on this debate. He pointed out that both debate teams performed very well and gave full play to their excellent language expression skills, logical thinking skills and team spirit, but there were also shortcomings. He suggested that the debate teams from both sides should make more comparisons on the debate topics, debate from a higher perspective, and improve their ability to catch each other's loopholes, etc. Finally, the host announced: Capital University of Economics and Business was the winner.
Beijing Jiaotong University Debate Team
Capital University of Economics and Business Debate Team
At this point, the preliminary round of the 4th Capital University w88 casino of Economics Debate Competition has come to an end. The semi-finalists are w88 casino, Peking University, Central University of Finance and Economics and Capital University of Economics and Business. w88 casino will face Peking University, and the Central University of Finance and Economics will face off against the Capital University of Economics and Business. The semi-finals will be held4month21日Held. News network reporters will follow up and report, so stay tuned.
