2007 Economic and w88 Debate Competition

Interview with Peking University’s best debater—Hao Le

Published: April 21, 2007 Editor:

w88 casino News Network (Reporter Zhang Xian Huang Wei)After the first match of the rematch of the Economic and w88 Debate Competition, a reporter from the News Network conducted an interview with Hao Le from Peking University, the best debater in the competition. Hao Le will be referred to as "Hao" below, and the reporter from the news network will be referred to as "Ji".

Note: First of all, congratulations on being the best debater tonight. How do you think you performed today?

A: I think all four of our debaters performed very well. We used everything we had prepared in advance, and the four of us cooperated very well.

Reporter: It is a pity that Peking University failed today. What do you think is the main reason for the failure?

A: First of all, I would like to correct that this is not a failure, but an end. Our debate is over. I think, in fact, our debate team of four is not a truly excellent debate team. We admit this, and we still have a lot to improve. The debaters in your w88 casino performed very well today. Their demeanor and thinking were very good. I think the four of us need some improvement in our demeanor. Thank you also for providing us with a comparison so that we can have a development goal.

Recorder: You face failure with a smile and accept our interview with a smile. This is already a kind of demeanor.

Answer: This is the same word. This is not failure, it is the end.

Reporter: Today is not the home game of Peking University. Did the atmosphere of the audience put any pressure on you?

A: I think this is reasonable and there is no need for me to complain about this. If this competition is held at Peking University, the reverse is also true. Moreover, the enthusiastic response from the audience also supported our debate competition. When we say something better, your classmates will also applaud us without any prejudice. As for the number of people, this is determined objectively, so it doesn’t matter.

Recorder: What do you think of the other debater? In other words, which debater impressed you the most?

A: I think all four of them have very good demeanor. As for our team, others have always pointed out that we lack a bit of grace. Then, I think you four debaters performed very well in terms of their temperament, appearance, and thinking.

Recorder: What prompted you to choose debate?

Hao: The four of us are very happy working together.

Note: Cooperation brings happiness?

Hao: Yes, the four of us are very good friends. This is also the most useful and valuable thing I get from the debate.

Recorder: If you have the opportunity next year, will you choose to participate in such a competition?

Hao: This, just like "virtue" is unpredictable, this is also unpredictable. (laughing)

Note: If you have the opportunity, I wish you good results next year.

Hao: Thank you!

Note: Thank you for accepting our interview!