w88 casino News Network (Reporter Yu Hongxian）2007Year12month7日夜7：00, the final and closing ceremony of the first "Integrity Financial Training Cup" Beijing University Joint Debate Competition was held in the Integrity three-story international conference hall of w88 casino. The competition is hosted by the Youth League Student Union of the w88 casino of Finance of the w88 casino, and co-organized by the Youth League Student Union of the w88 casino of Economics of Renmin University of China, the Youth League Student Union of the w88 casino of Finance of the Central University of Finance and Economics, and the Economics and Business Administration Student Association of Beijing Normal University. We are honored to invite Doctors of Economics Zou Yasheng, Ding Zhijie, Wang Weihan, Dong Baomin, Doctor of Laws Matt and Mr. Xu Guoqing, Chairman of Chengxun Financial Training Company, as judges. w88 casino807037_7076
Contest judges
Before the official finals, the organizer invited eight debaters from four universities to compete in a debate exhibition competition. The topic of the debate is: "Is money the root of all evil?" The debaters from both sides engaged in a heated exchange of words. Before the finals even started, they saw the smoke of gunfire and gave the audience a wonderful performance.
The finals have officially begun.Associate Professor Zou Yasheng, deputy dean of the w88 casino of Finance, delivered a speech first. He briefly reviewed the process of this competition and expressed his affirmation of the wonderful performance of the players. At the same time, he expressed his deep blessings and expectations for the competition.Mr. Xu Guoqing’s brief speech won rounds of applause from the audience.
The debate topic in the final is "Do huge foreign exchange reserves do more harm than harm to China's economic development, or do more harm than good?" The affirmative side is the team from the w88 casino of Finance of China University of Finance and Economics, whose view is that "huge foreign exchange reserves have more benefits than harm to China's economic development"; the negative side is the team from the w88 casino of Finance of the w88 casino, whose view is "huge foreign exchange reserves do more harm than good to China's economic development."
Zhengfang Central University of Finance and Economics Team
Opposing w88 casino team
After the game starts, the first thing is for both sides to make a speech. Jin Qiuzi, a student from Zhengfang Yibi, stated Zhengfang’s point of view in a very logical language. my countryForeign exchange reservesIt is sufficient and maintains a growth trend, which is conducive to maintaining the external credibility of the country and enterprises, and enhancing confidence in my country's economy and the RMB at home and abroad; it is conducive to expanding international w88 and attracting foreign investment; it is conducive to maintaining the stability of the financial system, responding to emergencies, and preventing and resolving international financial risks.Opposition student Wang Kui cited many examples in his speech to clearly illustrate the opposition’s point of view.In recent years, with the rapid development of China's economy, China's foreign exchange reserves have grown rapidly. Especially since2002It will show a rapid growth trend after the year.The continued growth of foreign exchange reserves reflects the internal and external imbalances in China’s economy,There is pressure to appreciate the RMB, which is not conducive to long-term foreign export w88.
In the debate session, the sharp questions and witty answers from both sides won applause from the audience. After both sides made a summary of their defense, the exciting defense session ended.
In the following free debate session, both sides made witty remarks and were constantly exciting. Tang Xiaotong, who argued for the negative side in the fourth argument, used his excellent professional knowledge and cited a large amount of evidence to prove his point of view. Li Ji, who argued for the positive side in the third argument, also used his wit to cleverly resolve the opponent's problems. The content of the free debate was rich and colorful, and the debaters fully demonstrated their excellent eloquence and grace.
In the concluding speech session, the opposing side first made a speech. Tang Xiaotong pointed out the mistakes made by the other side during the debate and provided examples to prove the opposing side's views. Chen Ting, who is the author of the fourth argument of the positive side, analyzed and summarized the previous links, and emphasized his own point of view.
The last part is questions from the audience. The sharp and exciting questions and answers between the audience and the debaters made the atmosphere lively again.
Audience questions
The judges commented on this competition.Ding ZhijieProfessorHe highly praised the wonderful debate between both parties, conducted an in-depth analysis of the debate topic, and gave his own opinions and suggestions. Finally, Ding ZhijieProfessorI have placed deep hopes on the students, hoping that everyone can learn and grow in the debate and become more capable and outstanding talents.Subsequently, the chairman of the competition announced: The winner of this competition is the opposing side - the w88 casino. Li Ji, the third affirmative speaker, won unanimous praise from the judges with her witty answers and won the title of best debater.
Closing Ceremony of the First Beijing University Joint Debate Competition of "Chengxun Financial Training Cup"Held subsequently. The presenting guest presented awards to the debaters. get5The best debaters in the competition are: Zhang Shu from Renmin University of China, Xing Huayuan from w88 casino, Wu Nan from Beijing Normal University, Fang Jia from Beijing Normal University, Che Lu from Renmin University of China and Central University of Finance and EconomicsLi Ji. In this competition, the w88 casino won the championship, Central University of Finance and Economics won the runner-up, and Beijing Normal University and Renmin University of China won the third runner-up.
Best debater
Winning Team
