w88 casino News Network (Reporters Huang Lei Yu Fan)The third match of the debate between the w88 casino of Law and the w88 casino of Information was held8日夜7Point at Ningyuan Building826Hold. Teacher Cai Shaowei from the Chinese Department, teacher Li Zijie from the International Business w88 casino, and teacher Zhang Li from the Student Affairs Office attended as judges.
The debate topic of this competition is: Should we pursue victory in life or should we give up when things are good? The orthodox law schools that support the view of pursuing victory first make a statement, pointing out that pursuing victory is to further expand the results on the basis of existing victories and to rationally exert advantages. Life is endless and struggle is endless. In life, one should be brave enough to accept challenges and pursue victory instead of being obsessed with victory. This is the process of personal value realization and the need for social progress. Pursuing victory is the embodiment of the spirit of the times. The positive side argued eloquently, and the opposing side, the w88 casino of Information, was not to be outdone. The opening argument emphasizes that "acceptance" does not mean stagnating or not wanting to make progress, but rather stopping to think and accumulate in the choices of life to fully understand oneself and the surrounding environment. This is a rational choice, full of the brilliance of people-oriented humanity. Both sides made rigorous arguments and concise statements, which gradually heated up the atmosphere of the debate.
The next step is the exciting attack and defense session, which not only requires the debaters to be well prepared, but also requires them to adapt on the spot. During the competition, both sides went back and forth, asking each other tough questions one after another. From the defeat of Germany in World War II to Napoleon's lesson of greed for merit, from the w88 casino motto of "Pursue in search and practice diligently" to Qu Yuan's famous saying of "The road is long and long, I will search high and low". Both sides quoted from ancient and modern times, both at home and abroad, reflecting their outstanding eloquence and broad knowledge.
One round was more exciting than the other, and the atmosphere in the free defense session was even more intense. The debaters cited Wal-Mart's successful experience, Zeng Guofan's retirement after success, etc. to prove their point of view. The materials are rich and the arguments are sufficient. What left a deeper impression was the on-field demeanor of the players. They took turns, answered questions calmly and in an orderly manner, and asked questions sharply and with quick wit. The contestants conquered the audience time and time again with their active thinking and super reaction ability, and warm applause broke out from time to time. Especially in the second argument of the affirmative, he responded quickly, eloquently spoke, and won bursts of applause from the audience.
Finally, it’s time for the summary statement of the four arguments. The opposition once again emphasizes the view that "you should give up when things are good in life", pointing out that this is a harmonious world view, and demonstrates from the negative side that "pursuit of victory" is more likely to make subjectivist errors, ignore objective conditions, be dazzled by victory, and thus bear more risks. In response to this statement, the fourth argument of the affirmative pointed out that being afraid of risks and not daring to face opportunities are wrong values. Then, she further stated the true meaning of "pursuing victory". It is not about blind pursuit, but about using a positive attitude and a broad mind to pursue a higher spiritual realm and accept opportunities and challenges in life. This is the true meaning of advancing with the times. The four debate speeches of both sides were brilliant and well-founded. Their statements were calm and confident, with the demeanor of a debater, which brought a successful conclusion to the wonderful performance of the debaters in the entire competition.
The debaters’ verbal battle made the audience eager to try. During the question-and-answer session, the audience was very enthusiastic. They asked the debaters questions about their opinions on the debate topics in this competition and received satisfactory answers.
Finally, the judges talked about their own feelings and comments on the competition. Teacher Li Shaowei concluded that the essence of the arguments presented by both sides was about "preventing corruption" and "preventing laziness", and relatively speaking, the affirmative's arguments were easier to use. She praised the affirmative side for speaking little but often making unexpected witty remarks, while the negative side was calm and composed with the demeanor of a general. On the whole, the positive teams cooperated well, and the debaters assisted each other, which showed that they were fully prepared before the game.
The host announced the results of the competition. The winner was Zhengfa Academy, and the best debater was Qin Jiameng, the second debater of Zhengfa. In an interview with the best debater after the game, she said that she had less time to prepare for this competition, but she was still very confident. Debating requires high response and communication skills, which can be gradually trained through daily communication. This debate has come to a successful conclusion, and we look forward to more exciting performances from all participating teams.
