The sharp words show the thoughtfulness of the blog and the sharpness of thinking
w88 casino News Network (provided by the w88 casino of Government)Language and thought collide, wisdom and inspiration collide passionately. In order to enhance students' understanding and concern about public utilities and public policies, cultivate public spirit, and exercise students' critical thinking ability on public affairs governance, combined with the characteristics of the public management discipline and focusing on today's hot public policy issues, the Youth League Committee of the w88 casino of Government organized and held the third Public Policy Debate Competition.
This event attracted a total of 168 students from 12 colleges across the w88 casino to actively participate. A total of 56 competitions were organized from the preliminary round to the finals, and nearly a thousand students watched the competition online and offline. The competition is divided into three stages: preliminary, semi-finals and finals.
April 29On the afternoon of the same day, the finals of the competition were held at Ningyuan Building 221The moot court was successfully held. Lei Liang, Deputy Secretary of the Party Committee of the w88 casino of Government, An Ping, Secretary of the Youth League Committee of the w88 casino of Government, Teacher Ning Jing from the Department of Administration, and Teacher Feng Xinrui from the Department of Administration attended.
After various rounds of competition in the preliminary round and semi-finals, the No. 1 team composed of Huang Zhenyi, Zhang Yihang, and Liu Jingyuan and the No. 2 team composed of Liu Chang, Liu Puxuan, and Wen Zhihan stood out and entered the finals. This final is based on "Should the Civil Service Examination be broken35 years old threshold"Debate for the topic. It is worth mentioning that this debate competition has added a "surprise attack" link. Both sides of the debate can choose to take a "surprise attack" after each major link, which greatly enhances the visibility of the debate and puts forward higher requirements for the on-the-spot reaction ability of the debaters on both sides and their understanding of the debate policy.
The competition begins with each party making their arguments. The first defense of the affirmative took the proposal of the National People's Congress representative as the starting point to present the current situation in the system, and cited foreign cases to propose liberalizing the civil service examination35year-old threshold, in order to achieve the purpose of transforming the civil service structure; but the opposition proposed that "breaking the threshold will increase the cost of examination organization and reduce the efficiency of admissions”, four-level argumentation from both macro and micro perspectives. Both sides made arguments and quoted extensively, combining theory and reality to fully demonstrate the gains and losses of the policy, each laying a solid foundation for their own debate. In the debate session, the two sides focused on several contradictions such as "specialized personnel" and "how to select talents", "labor market transformation" and "mass mid-life crisis", and exchanged witty remarks. The second debate of the negative side found a new approach, and the third debate of the positive side was thoughtful in thinking, which aroused the praise of the judges and the audience, and the scene climaxed one after another. In the "surprise attack" session, the positive side proposed that "life is not a final exam, but a marathon" and advocated "recruiting talents in an eclectic way" to get things started. The negative side emphasized the importance of work experience and ideological awareness for civil servants. The fierce debate continued into the free debate session, where the two sides exchanged words. The collision of ideas and opinions shocked the audience and gave everyone a deeper understanding of public policy, which perfectly fit the theme of the policy debate.
At the end of the competition, several judges made wonderful comments on this debate competition. While fully affirming the debaters on both sides, teacher Ning Jing also advocated that college students go deeper into the grassroots level, experience the effects of policy implementation, and promote thinking through practice, which will help improve the rigor and scientificity of logic in both debate and personal understanding. Teacher Feng Xinrui praised both sides of the debate in terms of field control ability and logical rigor. He also shared good books with everyone, which made the debate topic more realistic and speculative.
After the judges’ evaluation, the opposing team won the final victory.
Teacher Lei Liang awards the first prize team
Teachers Feng Xinrui and Ning Jing presented awards to the second prize team
The winning results of this competition are as follows
First Prize:
Liu Chang (w88 casino of Foreign Languages)
Liu Puxuan (w88 casino of Finance)
Wen Zhihan (w88 casino of Chinese Language and Literature)
Second Prize:
Huang Zhenyi (w88 casino of Foreign Languages)
Liu Jingyuan (w88 casino of Information)
Zhang Yihang (w88 casino of Chinese Language and Literature)
Third Prize:
Zhang Yujin (w88 casino of Government)
Zhuang Wanting (w88 casino of Government)
Tang Shuting (English w88 casino)
Dong Yiduo (w88 casino of International Economics and w88)
Cheng Meiyi (w88 casino of International Economics and w88)
Cui Yuxuan (English w88 casino)
This activity fully demonstrated the spirit of the public management discipline, guided students to understand and pay attention to policies and cutting-edge issues in social development, and further enriched the content of the "Management Month" series of activities in the w88 casino of Government Management. We hope that our students will continue to think diligently, explore and seek true knowledge in their future studies.
