w88 casino News Network (Reporter Wang Tianzhu)11month20日夜75831_5861301The classroom was held enthusiastically. The debate was between the w88 casino of Information and the w88 casino of International Economics and w88. The topic was "Do the benefits of installing cameras in public places outweigh the disadvantages or does the disadvantages outweigh the benefits?" Law w88 casino teacher Su Haopeng, w88 casino of Humanities teacher Li Haiying and w88 casino of Finance teacher Guo Hongyu served as judges for this competition.

The judges of the competition are teachers Su Haopeng, Guo Hongyu and Li Haiying

In the opening speech, the affirmative made a clear argument. By citing a series of data, he explained the huge benefits that the installation of cameras has brought to individuals, collectives and the country. The opposing side made an impassioned argument, pointing out that as my country's relevant legal system is not yet complete and management training and post-maintenance are not in place, installing cameras will do more harm than good.

The affirmative debater makes an impassioned speech

The next step is the attack and defense session. The second argument of the affirmative took the lead and used strict logic to continuously question. Through propositions such as "Protecting the safety of people's lives and property is our country's basic task" and "my country's crime rate is still high", we derived the conclusion that "the installation of cameras plays an important role in maintaining social security." The opposition is not to be outdone. Based on the fact that despite the installation of cameras, the crime rate in the UK continues to rise, it is proposed that the correct and reasonable use of cameras is a prerequisite for the effectiveness of cameras.

The opposition debater is full of passion

In the most intense stage of free debate, both sides hold their own opinions. You come and I go back and forth, evenly matched. In response to the opposition's argument that my country's current legal system is insufficient to protect the reasonable use of cameras, the affirmative pointed out, "We must look at the problem from a developmental perspective. The improvement of the law in the future will definitely bring about greater use of camera functions." In response, the opposition responded sharply, "Tomorrow's development is determined by today's understanding and behavior. If we cannot have a correct understanding today, then tomorrow's development will be out of the question." The opposing side also pointed out that the lack of reality makes the affirmative's remarks tantamount to fantasy. Zhengfang responded positively, "We believe that the objective conditions of society will continue to improve." The verbal battle between the two sides won bursts of applause and admiration from the audience.

In the summary session, both sides pointed out each other's weaknesses and summarized their own views. The opposition side once again emphasized, "The camera is just a tool, with no pros and cons in itself. The basis for judging its pros and cons should be the reasonableness of its use. The thousands of civilian cameras in our country every year imply a large number of irrational and legal applications." Finally, the four opposing sides said objectively: "Although everyone very much hopes that cameras can bring benefits to society, real life requires us to keep a cool head and be aware of the disadvantages of installing them in public places." The affirmative side also convinced people with its reasoning and used a large amount of data to once again confirm its argument.

The audience present is still unsatisfied

After the debate, the interested audience continued to ask questions to the debaters. The debaters’ humorous answers made the atmosphere relaxed and natural. Afterwards, teacher Su Haopeng briefly summarized the debate and spoke highly of the topic "Pros and cons of using cameras in public places".

Teacher Su Haopeng’s enthusiastic comments

Throughout the whole debate, the debaters were either gentle, eloquent, calm, or passionate. The wonderful debate brought a feast of speech to the audience. In the end, Wang Haosu, the affirmative debater, won the title of the best debater in the competition, and the opposition team from the w88 casino of International Economics and w88 successfully advanced to the finals.