w88 casino News Network (Internship Reporter Congratulations)11month6日夜7Points， The third "East Asia International Cup" w88 casino Debate Competition continues to be wonderful. The debate topic of this competition is "Should the Internet implement a real-name system?" The positive International Business w88 casino believes that "the Internet should implement a real-name system," while the opposing International Business w88 casino holds the view that "the Internet should not implement a real-name system." TeacherLiu Yannan、Zhang Yuxin,Li YanBe the judge of this competition. The game attracted widespread attention from students in w88 casino. The stadium was already packed before the game started.
The venue was packed
The competition officially started, and Song Yan, the first defender, made the opening argument. After a brief introduction to the Internet real-name system, Song Yan elaborated on the reasons why the Internet should implement a real-name system from three aspects: network development, people's rights and social construction. Immediately after the opposition's argument, Wu Ji made her argument. She first questioned the affirmative's point of view, and then stated her view that the real-name system should not be implemented on the Internet from five aspects, including the protection of netizens' personal information.
The second argument of the affirmative side listens to the other side’s argument
In the attack and defense session, Tana, the second defender of the affirmative side, first asked Miao Lin, the third defender of the negative side, a question: "How to take effective measures to curb people from spreading bad information or engaging in bad behavior online?" The negative side answered calmly. Then, Bai Yanling, the second defender of the negative side, pointed out to the second defender of the positive side that cybercrime only accounts for 1% of the total criminal cases0.4%, and Tana, the second defender of the affirmative, replied wittily: "You can't just let it go just because it is small," and compared it to examples of murder crimes, which attracted bursts of applause from the audience. After that, Liu Yandong, the affirmative's third defender, used w88 casino's information platform andbbsThe real-name system was used to prove his point of view, and his wonderful rhetorical questions also left a deep impression on the audience. In this round of debate, the debaters from both sides answered questions and answers in a lively manner, and the whole game quickly reached a climax.
The opposite side is divided into two arguments to attack
After the two sides conducted a simple summary of their defense, the competition ushered in the most anticipated free debate. The two parties conducted a dialectical and profound analysis on the feasibility of implementing a real-name system on the Internet, the confidentiality of citizens' personal information, reality and virtuality, law and morality, etc. The audience was amazed by the rigor and depth of their thinking. In the tit-for-tat exchanges of words, novel inspirations emerged several times, sparking thoughts.
Finally, both sides will make their concluding remarks. Wang Xiaojing, the fourth debater from the negative side, methodically refuted the positive side's views and summarized his own views from several aspects such as the difficulties in promoting and implementing the online real-name system and insufficient technical conditions. In the fourth argument of the affirmative, Ma Xun stated that freedom of speech should be based on certain constraints, with strict logic and comprehensive thinking.
The audience enthusiastically asked questions
Zhang Yuxin made a short comment on the game
After the competition, judge Zhang Yuxin commented on the competition. He affirmed the wonderful performance of both sides, and also put forward some suggestions tactfully. He hoped that through further extension of this debate topic, students from the University of w88 and Economics can become responsible people for themselves.
The debaters from both sides took photos with the judges
The International w88 casino of Economics and w88 won the final victory in this competition, and Wang Xiaojing, the negative debater, won the title of best debater.
