This debate is hosted by the w88 casino of Finance, w88 casino, and co-organized by Peking University, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing Normal University, and University of Science and Technology Beijing. Wu Nan, President of the Debate Association of Beijing Normal University, Guan Chengyi, President of the Speech and Debate Association of Beijing Forestry University, Zhang Xiang, Secretary of the Speech and Debate Association of Beijing Forestry University, Fan Xiaojie of Communication University of China, Yang Bing, former captain of the debate team of Peking University w88 casino of Government, and Wu Di, leader of the debate team of Peking University w88 casino of Medicine, were invited to be the judges of this debate competition.

Min Shengtong, the study department director of the Student Union of the w88 casino of Finance, was interviewed by a reporter from the News Network. The format of this debate was a breakthrough based on last year. The six universities were divided into two groups. The three schools in each group competed in a single round-robin competition. The first place in each group entered the finals. The debate topics are closely centered on economic issues, and the finals will be based on academic issues. The debate team of the w88 casino of Finance represented the w88 casino in this competition. The debate team of the w88 casino of Finance was formed last year and won the third place in the w88 casino debate and won the third place in the "China Merchants Bank Cup"Entered the finals of the 2nd w88 casino Debate Competition.

Who is in charge of external affairs and domestic finance?

The two sides in the opening match are the w88 casino and the Central University of Finance and Economics. The debate team of the w88 casino, composed of Lei Ting, Wang Jiaqi, Yu Qianqian, and Wang Ziwei, and the debate team of the Central University of Finance and Economics, composed of Lu Zehong, Gu Shuran, Li Qi, and Li Feng, launched a fierce debate on the issue of "whether globalization is beneficial to developing countries."

In the argumentative part, Zhengfang Yibian discussed the characteristics of globalization and its benefits to developing countries from the perspective of economic development and cultural prosperity. The opposing side questioned the affirmative's argument and expressed the view that globalization would do more harm than good to developing countries.

The subsequent attack and defense session seemed calm, but in fact it was stormy. The second debate of the affirmative side shifted the question to the long-term and short-term impact of globalization on developing countries. The second debate of the negative side asked sharp questions about the impact of the subprime mortgage crisis on the economies of various countries around the world. The second debate of the affirmative side seized on the loopholes in the questions and responded cleverly, which aroused warm applause from the audience.

In their concluding remarks, the four opponents reiterated that we cannot only see the benefits of globalization while ignoring the costs paid by developing countries in the process of globalization. The fourth argument of the affirmative emphasized that globalization will bring long-term benefits to developing countries, and the thinking of globalization makes developing and developed countries restrict each other and make progress together. She believes that developing countries should bravely meet the challenges of globalization and move forward courageously in the wave of globalization.

Then the audience questions and answers session begins. The audience's in-depth questions further deepened the theme of this debate. The atmosphere was relaxed and lively, with lots of applause.

Wu Nan, President of Beijing Normal University Debate Association, commented on this debate. He first analyzed the debate topic. He believes that the topic of this debate is very meaningful. As the largest developing country, China should think deeply about how to deal with globalization. The discussion between the two economics universities on this issue will have a positive role in promoting the formulation of future economic policies. He gave an objective evaluation of the performance of the debaters on both sides. He believes that the affirmative debaters have solid theories, sufficient materials, and fluent expressions; the negative debaters have quick responses, comprehensive answers, and profound insights. At the same time, he also pointed out the shortcomings of both sides in this debate. He said that the debaters on both sides were too one-sided in presenting their views and did not provide an in-depth analysis of what smart measures developing countries should take to develop faster in the face of globalization. His comments were lively and humorous, with an overview of the whole scene and every word was precise.

Finally, Zhengfang w88 casino won the first battle. Lei Ting, the first debater of the affirmative, won the title of best debater.

After the game, reporters from the News Network interviewed Lei Ting, the first defender for the affirmative, and Gu Shuran, the second defender for the negative. Lei Ting told reporters that although the team members prepared for the first game in a hurry, they collected sufficient information. She believed that the preparations were not fully utilized on the scene. In response to the deficiencies pointed out by the judges, she said she would work harder on her on-the-spot performance and strive to perform better in the next competition. Gu Shuran admitted that his team was not well prepared. He believed that the debate topic was very professional and difficult to grasp, but he was absolutely confident that he would perform better in future competitions.

Among the talented students from the six schools, who can win the crown? What results will the w88 casino achieve in this Beijing University Joint Debate Competition? Please look forward to the next exciting match between the w88 casino and the University of Science and Technology Beijing.