w88 casino News Network (Internship Reporter Li Chao)11month6日夜7Points, The second semi-final of the second "China Merchants Bank Cup" w88 casino Debate Competition was held in Ningyuan Building828 gongStart the war. The two sides in this debate are the Chinese w88 casino and the w88 casino of Finance. This competition will determine which team can participate in the finals. Therefore, both sides have made full preparations and are determined to win the competition.The judges for this competition are Zan Xin, a teacher from the International Business w88 casino, Dong Ling, a teacher from the Law w88 casino, and Che Hao, a teacher from the Law w88 casino.
The two teams in the competition had a heated discussion on "whether advanced consumption should be encouraged to develop the economy." Zhengfang Chinese College sent a young and energetic team of three08Grade 1 freshman and one078070_809507grade students, attack strongly and strive to win the championship.
In the opening argument stage, Zheng Fang introduced the topic of the debate by citing the great significance of advanced consumption to the working class and peasant class, and then defined "advanced consumption as using tomorrow's money to create today's business", and clearly pointed out that Zheng Fang's point of view supports and encourages advanced consumption. The opposition also proposed another definition of advanced consumption, which is “expending more than one’s income can bear in real life.” They analyzed the opponent’s point of view: It is inappropriate to blindly support advanced consumption without taking into account the acceptance capacity of contemporary Chinese people. Next, we will analyze the ills of excessive consumption on individuals and society from both micro and macro aspects. Both parties had clear ideas and clear views, winning rounds of applause from the audience.
At the beginning of the attack and defense session, the second defense of the affirmative side asked questions and the second defense of the negative side. The questions were progressive and detailed, which reflected the sufficient preparation and strict logic of the affirmative side. The opposing debaters did not show weakness. When faced with the affirmative's questions, they responded carefully and calmly, making the debate more intense and exciting. The affirmative side cited specific examples such as the "large aircraft project", combined with the current economic situation, talked about the benefits of advanced consumption, and pointed out that the state's investment, import and export is also a reasonable awareness of advanced consumption; the negative side raised questions about whether the Chinese people have confidence in advanced consumption and whether they have the ability to bear the consequences after consumption, and gave a strong refutation of the positive side's words.
Opposition player’s passionate question
In the summary of attack and defense, the pros and cons once again clarify their respective views and organize the debate ideas, so that the audience can more clearly understand the views of both sides and gain support. The judges also nodded frequently in agreement.
The free debate that followed was the most exciting. The positive side raises a series of questions such as "How to solve the low purchase rate of farmers" and "Is it too one-sided to only focus on investment and not consumption in developing the economy?" and points out the benefits of continuously improving the economic system in the process of sustainable development and encouraging advanced consumption from the perspective of people's livelihood. The negative side insists on the conservative thinking in the Chinese people's consumption concept, points out the practical difficulties in allowing Chinese people who cannot fully guarantee food and clothing to engage in excessive consumption, and raises questions about the role of advanced consumption in economic development. Both sides spoke fluently and quoted classics, winning bursts of applause from the audience.
The affirmative player responded calmly
The final summaries of both sides provided a good ending to this debate. While the judges were withdrawing, the audience actively interacted with the contestants. Their sharp questions and fluent thinking added a lot of color to the entire debate.
Finally, judge Zan Xin made the final comments. She said that the debate questions this time were clear and easy to find the entry point, and the students were fully prepared. She also quoted a saying from Americans in China: "We put our trust in Obama because he is21People of the century," she said: "I admire these players because they are21The debater of the century! "At the same time, she also pointed out the shortcomings of contestants who sometimes open up the topic too much.
Judge Zan Xin’s wonderful comments
In the end, the w88 casino of Finance became the winner of the competition, and their debater Wang Jiaqi won the honor of the best debater.
The reporter finally interviewed the contestants. Although the Chinese w88 casino did not win, they said they had no regrets and actually enjoyed the fun. Wang Jiaqi, the best debater from the w88 casino of Finance, said that their debate topic had certain advantages. Coupled with the simulation exercises and tacit understanding before the competition, winning the competition was inevitable.
Contestants took photos with the judges
Late8：20The debate ended successfully with applause, and the contestants from both sides took photos with the judges.
