w88 casino News Network (Reporter Li Binbin）10month22日夜7：00, the "China Merchants Bank Cup" w88 casino Debate Competition hosted by the Youth League Committee and the Student Union of the Law w88 casino Youth League was held in Ningyuan828Wonderful opening. Cao Yahong, Deputy Secretary of the Party Branch of the Law w88 casino, Yan Lihong, Secretary of the Youth League Branch of the Law w88 casino, and Chen Caiyou, the Youth League Committee of the w88 casino, attended the opening ceremony as guests. Li Jingyu, director of the Propaganda Department of the Party Committee of the w88 casino, and Liu Hongyuan and Ma Wei, teachers from the w88 casino of Humanities, served as judges for the opening battle of the debate - the Law w88 casino vs. Business w88 casino competition.

At the beginning of the opening ceremony, a video carefully produced by the Network Department of the Law Student Union first ignited the passion of the audience. The video reviews the glorious past of the first debate competition last year, and the wonderful moments in the debate are once again vividly displayed. Accompanied by exciting music, photos of the debaters from the eleven college teams competing this time were displayed one by one, and the audience gave warm cheers to their favorite debaters from time to time. Later, Liang Aobo, chairman of the Law w88 casino Student Union, delivered an opening speech. He hoped that the participating teams could demonstrate their own style and wished this debate a complete success.

Immediately afterwards, the first game of the first debate began wonderfully. The first battle was between the positive team composed of four students from the Business w88 casino - Zhu Qiong, Zhang Yahui, Li Qiao and Zhang Yukun, against the anti-Method w88 casino students Ying Zongguo, Chen Yao, Sun Zhengyuan and Zheng Yue. The topic of this debate is: Who is more responsible for the Sanlu milk powder incident? The positive side holds the view that "the occurrence of the Sanlu milk powder incident is more the responsibility of the state", while the negative side holds the view that "the occurrence of the Sanlu milk powder incident is more the responsibility of the enterprise".

The opening battle attracted the attention of many students

First of all, both the pros and cons make their own arguments, clarify their views and provide corresponding explanations. Subsequently, the second and third debates of the pros and cons respectively choose the other party's second or third debate to ask questions. The second debate of the affirmative side first asked the second debate of the negative side "Did Cao Cao meet Guan Yu on Huarong Road?" The second debate of the negative side cleverly avoided the question and brought the topic back to the "milk powder incident". Then the second debate of the negative side also chose the second debate of the positive side to ask questions. The two were tit-for-tat and could be said to be incompatible. Among the questions raised by the pros and cons, the pros and cons went back to the source and questioned the pros with "What are the criteria for defining who bears more responsibility?" Their detailed examples and stimulating arguments won warm applause from the audience.

After the brief summary of the pros and cons, the most exciting and intense free debate began. The debaters on both sides were eloquent and witty, using humorous and sharp language to find loopholes in each other. The intensity was no less intense than a close-quarters battle.

Sun Zhengyuan gave a wonderful discussion on the three opposing sides

In the final concluding remarks of the four arguments, the negative side elaborated on the view that "the system is lagging behind and enterprises should strengthen self-control and supervision"; the positive side expressed its argumentation ideas - and required nature, implementation and responsibility, and refuted the positive side's doubts about its argumentation ideas. The arguments on both sides are impassioned and thorough.

After the debate, the judges held a brief deliberation. During the judges' deliberations, the audience exchanged their questions with the debaters, and the atmosphere was relaxed and lively. Judge Li Jingyu pointed out that this debate topic was both valuable and difficult, but the debaters debated very deeply and thoroughly. Both sides are equally matched in terms of knowledge base and information mastery, and can be said to be evenly matched. At the same time, he also praised the negative side’s systematic theoretical knowledge and the positive side’s novel and rich examples.

In the end, the positive business w88 casino team won the debate, and Sun Zhengyuan from the negative side and the law w88 casino won the title of "Best Debater". In the battle of debate, who is in charge? It remains to be seen who will win the final debate competition. News Network will follow up the report, so stay tuned!

Two participating teams took photos with the judges