Current location: Homepage>Text

Qingqing Campus

Second debate showcasing erudition

Published: October 24, 2008 Edit:

w88 casino News Network (Reporter Davis Intern reporter Su Ying)10month23日夜7pointThe second session of the "China Merchants Bank Cup" w88 casino Debate Competition hosted by the Youth League Committee and the Student Union of the Law w88 casino Youth League was held in Boxue207He Erxue606Wonderful performance.

In erudition207, debaters from the w88 casino of Foreign Languages and the w88 casino of Humanities launched a fierce competition around the debate topic - "Does notarization of pre-marital property protect or destroy marriage?" The debate held here invited Sun Li, a teacher from the Law w88 casino, Wang Qing, a teacher from the w88 casino of Public Administration, and Tang Xingquan, a teacher from the Chinese w88 casino, to serve as judges.The debaters’ witty remarks, the audience’s enthusiasm and the judges’ incisive comments made the whole debate process brilliant.

The debaters’ passionate speeches

The opposing debaters are serious about dealing with the situation

As the main party, the Foreign Languages w88 casino summarized its point of view with three arguments at the beginning, that is, "notarization of pre-marital property is the protection of marriage." The argument was straightforward and impressive. The opposing party, the w88 casino of Humanities, was not to be outdone, and refuted the opponent with the sentence "Notarization of pre-marital property destroys mutual trust, and trust has no say in maintaining the marriage, and how it can protect the marriage." It immediately stated its position - "Notarization of pre-marital property is a destruction of marriage."

The free debate session of this competition unreservedly demonstrated the debaters’ ability to adapt to changing situations. As soon as the affirmative side finished arguing, the opposing side refuted it. The debaters' arguments were logical and well-founded, winning loud applause from the judges and the audience from time to time. Especially the second argument of the affirmative, with its strong voice, continuous questioning, and passionate and clever debate method, won a lot of applause.

During the judges’ discussion and scoring, the students present also raised sharp and targeted questions to the debaters on issues related to the debate. Their enthusiastic participation also added a lot to the debate competition.

Subsequently, the three judges came on stage to comment on the debate. Tang Xingquan, a teacher from the Chinese w88 casino, took the stage first. He praised the wonderful performance of the debaters that night. However, at the same time, he said that neither side of the debate clearly discussed the reasons why pre-marital property notarization would "protect" or "destroy" a marriage, and they both acted very nervous. He also gave the debaters advice on using their language in an organized and appropriate manner.

Judge Tang Xingquan commented

Sun Li, a teacher at the Law w88 casino, analyzed the debate topic from a legal perspective and said that both the pros and cons should seize the laxity of the other party and attack it.

Wang Qing, a teacher at the w88 casino of Public Administration, put forward three suggestions after commenting on both sides: first, be fully prepared before the debate and strengthen teamwork; second, have the momentum and confidence to overwhelm the other party during the debate; third, when preparing, calculate the time accurately and use the most concise and beneficial language.

Finally,The host of the debate announced that Zhengfang Foreign Languages College had won, and Wang Jiangchuan, the second debater of Zhengfang, was the best debater.

At the same time, in Erxue606The positive side English College and the negative side Insurance College started a war of words on the topic of "should the city's business card focus on economy or culture".

In the argument stage, the debaters from both sides gave brief and precise statements on their own views. Entering the attack and defense stage, the affirmative side used the Olympic Games as the starting point for the second debate, asking the opposition opponent "Why is China's 5,000-year-old culture?"2001won the right to host the Olympic Games". Faced with such a tricky question, the opposing players did not show any weakness and followed up with "200116191_16331

In the most exciting free debate stage of the entire debate, the intensity of the debate between the two sides increased significantly. The affirmative player first went directly to the topic of the attack and defense part, clearly stating that "the accumulation of culture is based on the economy, so the city's business card is fundamentally based on the economy." The negative player immediately refuted the positive player for "artificially severing economic and cultural ties and secretly changing concepts." Throughout the free debate, debaters from both sides attacked each other's flaws in each other's statements and emphasized their own points of view many times.Sharp words,Quiet words. Wonderful performanceWon rounds of applause from the audience.

The final closing argument was also very exciting. Wei Yipu, the fourth opponent of the opposition, spoke first. She first pointed out that the affirmative player had made conceptual mistakes during the free debate, and then used her majestic statement The "Five Questions to Debate Friends" concluded the opposition's argument in one go. Faced with the challenge from her opponents, affirmative debater Zuo Aining showed no fear. She reiterated her argument that "a city's business card should focus on economic themes." The entire speech was progressive and precise, and her clear thinking and meticulous thinking won the unanimous approval of the audience.

While the judges left to discuss the results, the audience exchanged their questions with the debaters on the floor. When the audience from both sides asked the other side's contestants questions with rich examples, the debaters from both sides rushed to stand up and speak in rebuttal. The intensity and excitement were no less than those debated before.

Finally, the moderator announced that the opposing insurance college team won the debate. Ke Boyi, the opponent's third debater, won the title of best debater.

Related links: Wonderful opening of the w88 casino Debate Competition

For more information, please follow the w88 casino’s official WeChat and Weibo

Submission email: news@uibe.edu.cnReader feedback: xcb@uibe.edu.cnAll rights reserved by the Propaganda Department of the Party Committee of the w88 casino Copyright © 2005-2021 UIBE All rights reserved.
w88 casino registration number: Foreign Economic and w88 Network No. 31418006