w88 casino News Network (Special Correspondent Yu Hehuan, Wang Yucong）11month2日夜7Points, the w88 casino Debate Competition jointly organized by the Youth League Committee and the Youth League Student Union of the w88 casino of Law was held in Ningyuan Building. Held simultaneously that nightASaiheBSai, in Ningyuan528heldASaiyu Foreign Languages College versus Insurance College, in Ningyuan526heldBThe competition is a tit-for-tat confrontation between the w88 casino of English and the w88 casino of Finance.
ASports: War of words, brilliant display
AThe competition invited Teacher Yan Lihong, Secretary of the Youth League of the Law w88 casino, Teacher Liu Hongyuan from the w88 casino of Humanities, and Teacher Yang Yugong from the w88 casino of English to serve as judges. The debate topic of this competition is "Should university education be market-oriented?" The positive team is composed of four students from the w88 casino of Foreign Languages, Huang Kai, Cui Lin, Zhao Hongxiang, and Ru Ye, while the negative team of the Insurance w88 casino is composed of He Bo, Bu Jie, Fu Eyan, and Wang Yanqing. After a lively debate, the w88 casino of Insurance, which held the opposing view that "university education should not be market-oriented", won.
The affirmative debater showed his advantage in the first stage of the argument statement. Good expressions, clear ideas, and distinct opinions allowed the audience and judges to clearly understand their views and left a good impression on everyone. However, in the subsequent argumentation process, the affirmative's argument was not sufficient and the key points were not tight enough. On the contrary, although the opposition debaters performed unsatisfactorily in the first session and their views were not clear enough, they were sometimes aggressive and sometimes impassioned in the argument session. Their witty words and eloquence are amazing. And the opposition reiterated its views in its concluding remarks. Fu Eyan, the three-part counter debater, was named the best debater in the competition for his outstanding performance in the argument stage.
mostPost-JudgeThe teachers commented on the event. They first affirmed the sufficient and serious preparations made by both parties. But it also raised issues existing on both sides. The in-depth interpretation of the debate topic by the judges and teachers brought a successful conclusion to this debate competition.
Judges Comments on Competition A
BSports: tit for tat, in full swing
BThe competition invited teachers Zhou Yumei from the w88 casino of Humanities, Dong Ling and Liu Lin from the Law w88 casino to serve as judges. The English w88 casino team composed of Yan Qian, Wang Haosai, Du Jingwen and Lu Siyu believed that "those who are content are often happy", while the Finance w88 casino team composed of Deng Wenyang, Wang Jiaqi, Li Feifei and Wang Kui held the view that "those who are dissatisfied are often happy".
In the opening argument, Zhengfang Yibian fully explained the concept of contentment. She pointed out that contentment is a peaceful state of mind and a positive response to the real society. It is a state in which the current situation matches its own theory, with clear organization and distinct layers. At the same time, the opponent's argument was also sonorous and powerful, passionately proposing that the essence of dissatisfaction is not being complacent and unsatisfied with the status quo, which represents forge ahead and a more positive attitude towards life. However, in the rebuttal phase, the second debate of the negative side used a layered questioning method to lead the second debate of the positive side into the logical trap set by its own side, which was slightly better. However, the affirmative and second debaters seized the opportunity to counterattack at the beginning of the free debate and restrained the opposition's suppression. In the free debate, the positive side focused on "happiness" and emphasized the happiness that contentment brings to people; while the negative side focused on "normal" and emphasized the normal state of dissatisfaction. The wise words and thoughtful thinking of both parties brought the atmosphere to a climax. Both sides performed well in the final closing speeches. They have clear ideas and sufficient arguments, and they can work hard to find the other party's loopholes and refute them. The audience question session brought the atmosphere to another climax.
mostPost-JudgeThe teachers made a comprehensive evaluation of the competition, and the opposition w88 casino of Finance, which held the belief that "the dissatisfied are always happy", won, and the opposition's second debater was named the best debater in the competition. In addition, the judge teacher’s insightful summary pointed out that the highest level of debate is to reach a philosophical level, and from this level, the most perfect combination is to “be content with one’s content and be happy in life, and be dissatisfied with one’s work.” This teaching has also benefited us a lot.
Judges’ Comments on Competition B
Debate is a two-way gymnastics of language and wisdom. It is an experience of people’s response to language and an activity of wisdom. This debate enriched our study life and showed the elegance of the students of the University of w88 and Economics. In the next few weeks, the w88 casino-wide debate competition hosted by the General Student Union of the Law w88 casino will continue to be in full swing. We look forward to more excitement from the participating departments!
