w88 casino News Network (Reporter Zeng Rui) 11month15日, the second semi-final of the w88 casino debate competition came to a successful conclusion. In this fierce showdown between the two top schools, the w88 casino of International Economics and w88 defeated the w88 casino of Finance and advanced to the finals. Throughout the competition, the two teams each showed their strengths, and their eloquence was eloquent. The talents of the students from China Business University were clearly visible.
Prequel: The war ignites before the debate begins
This debate is held in7In Ningyuan526The classroom begins. Before the official start of the game, the stadium was already packed. This game was the second game of the semi-finals, and the importance was evident. Students from both colleges actively encouraged their teams, and the w88 casino of Finance even shouted loud slogans to cheer for the four debaters.
7point20points, the host introduced the judges of this competition-teachers Sun Li and Liu Yannan from the Law w88 casino and teacher Zhang Lihua from the w88 casino of English, and announced the start of the debate. In this competition, the w88 casino of International Economics and w88 took a positive position, while the w88 casino of Finance took a negative position. The two sides launched a fierce debate on the topic of "where is a journey going and who is traveling with it?"
Main story: both sides“The tip of a needle is facing the wheat awn”
The first is the self-presentation session, where both players appear and introduce themselves. The team of the w88 casino of Finance was very clever and clever. While making impassioned speeches, they also used the slogan “I’m going to be bumpy all the way, but I just want to be with you.” They ignited the atmosphere at the scene and cleverly asked questions.
In the following argumentation session, both sides state their views. The first argument of the affirmative side was well prepared and quoted from other sources, and chose examples from Sima Qian's historical records to prove his argument; the first argument of the negative side was leisurely and set up debate obstacles for the opponent's fellow debaters while establishing the argument, in order to emphasize that "who you go with is the most important thing." At this point in the game, the atmosphere was quite intense, with eight playersFollow the challenge calmly and show your style.
In the attack and defense phase, the winnerLaunched a small-scale offensive tactic, firmly grasping the argument that "direction is the criterion for determining who travels", and threw a "heavy bomb" to the opposing side - like-minded people are friends, and those who share the same path are friends. However, the opposing side did not answer directly, but set up another battlefield to demonstrate the problem of "those who are close to Zhu are red and those who are close to Mo are black". In the attack and defense session, neither debater answered the opponent's question completely from the front. Although it violated the rules of debate to a certain extent, it was also a good way to defend.
The next free debate is even moreThe smoke of gunfire filled the air, and both sides tried their best to face each other. However, both partiesThe styles of debate are obviously different. Whether they focus on reasoning or momentum, whether they focus on offense or defense, each has its own merits.Zheng Fang plays the logic card, starting with Sima Qian’s solo writing of historical records, and then talking about the relationship between the history of the Communist Party, Marxism-Leninism and the direction;The opposing side even counterattacked, using the method of reductio ad absurdum, from family relationships to college choices, his momentum is not inferior to that of his opponents. As for the excitement, the debaters' speeches were interrupted by applause, and the host had to signal the audience to watch quietly.
Opposite: Team of the w88 casino of International Economics and w88
Opposition: w88 casino of Finance team
It must be mentioned that during the free debate, contestants from both sides made serious mistakes in the debate. For example, in desperation, the financial team actually said the sentence "Sometimes the direction is more important than the people traveling with you, and sometimes the people traveling with you are more important than the direction." This added fuel to the opponent's argument; the debater pair of the economic and w88 representative from the positive side also made logical errors and reversed the order of the statements, which made the entire audience frustrated.
Entering the audience question session, the atmosphere relaxed slightly. However, Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon also has many good debaters in the audience. Many of the questions are extremely challenging, and the pressure on the debaters has not been relieved at all. A boy from the w88 casino of Finance was even more knowledgeable. He not only recorded and analyzed the deviations in the quotations of the economic and w88 team's materials during the contestants' debate, but also used his profound historical and cultural knowledge to teach Zheng Fang a lesson.
Backstory: The judges’ witty remarks
Another climax of this competition can be said to be brought by judge Liu Yannan.
"This topic is indeed difficult. To a certain extent, it is a 'chicken-and-egg vs. egg-laying' problem. It is difficult to discern a clear result; but such a topic is also very clever. It not only gives the positive side room to play, but also gives the negative side an opportunity to debate." Liu Yannan expressed her views on the debate topic.
Soon,Liu YannanThe teacher commented and guided the performance of the two debaters. For the speech part, the voice of the female debater from the affirmative side was thin and lacked strength. In terms of momentum, she was not as powerful as the negative side. "His voice can be used as an announcer!" Liu Yannan was silent for a moment.
Next, Liu Yannan raised some typical issues that occurred during the debate, such as too many gestures for the pros and cons, word taboos for the con side, etc. However, in general, the eight debaters from both sides were very good at every word and had different debating styles, which impressed the judges.Liu YannanThe teacher’s commenting style was very open and natural, and the audience applauded him several times involuntarily.
Even if two powerful forces fight, there must be a winner or loser. After the comments, the judge Sun Li announced the results of the competition - the team from the w88 casino of International Economics and w88 won. At the same time, due to the excitement of the competition and the performance of the contestants, after consultation with the organizers, the judges set a precedent for the w88 casino debate competition and selected the two best debaters, namely Yan Zheming, who argued the pros and cons, and Wang Kui, who argued the negative side. In this regard,Sun LiThe teacher gave an explanation of the evaluation: the pros and cons of the four debates were incisive and wise, so he was awarded the "Best Wisdom Award"; and the negative debate was extraordinary, calm and elegant, so he was awarded the "Best Debate Style Award".
Photograph of both parties and judges after the debate
Competition is not about winning or losing, but debate enlightens the soul. After the two semi-finals, the two sides of the final challenge of the debate have emerged - the w88 casino of International Economics and w88 and the w88 casino of Law. When we meet on a narrow road, the brave will win. Who will win the ultimate showdown? The finals are about to begin, so stay tuned to the news network for tracking reports.
