w88 casino News Network (Reporter Bao Xiaolin) 11month22 日夜7Points30The first w88 casino Debate Finals, long awaited by students from the w88 casino, opened grandly in the International Conference Hall on the third floor of the Chengxin Building. After twenty-four days of fierce competition, the debate team of the w88 casino of Economics and Business and the debate team of the w88 casino of Law passed all the tests and finally emerged from the elevenA participating team stood out and "killed" to the competition site today, providing everyone with an exciting audio-visual feast. Guests present at the final include Wang Xiaochuan, Secretary of the Party Branch of the Law w88 casino, Zhao Hongtao, Deputy Secretary of the Party Branch of the w88 casino of Economics and Business; Dai Changzheng, Dean of the w88 casino of Humanities, Fan Zemin of the Student Affairs Office, Wang Qing of the w88 casino of Humanities, Tang Xingquan of the Chinese Department, and Zhao Cuili of the w88 casino of Humanities were invited to be the judges of this competition.
The two sides in the final are: the w88 casino of Law, which takes a pro-positive stance and “justifies justice and seeks to gain its own”; the w88 casino of Economics and w88, which takes a negative stance and “justifies justice and does not seek to gain”. The debaters on both sides are "veterans of the debate" who have gone through the battlefield. They are rich in experience and have extraordinary abilities, which indicates that this game will be extremely fierce. It is because the war has not yet been ignited and the fighters are already hidden.
Wonderful preparations carefully prepared by the organizerPPTReviewed the wonderful moments of the first w88 casino Debate Competition from the preliminary round to the semi-finals. The debaters were full of energy and outstanding talents, which made the viewers fascinated and the listeners impressed. The rhythmic and dynamic music made the audience excited. The atmosphere at the scene gradually heated up.
The host announced the official start of the opening ceremony, and guest Wang Xiaochuan gave a wonderful speech. He affirmed the positive significance of holding such a debate, praised it as a new model of the second classroom, provided students with opportunities to display their talents, and enriched students' cultural life; he also wished this competition a complete success.
Wang Xiaochuan’s wonderful speech
Amid warm applause, the debaters from the Law w88 casino and the w88 casino of Economics and Business walked towards the debate seats with confident smiles and calm demeanor. Underneath the calm sea surface are actually surging waves, and under the relaxed and lively atmosphere there is a sense of tension. The loud slogans of the Law w88 casino heated up the atmosphere again.
Zhengfa College Team
Reverse International Economics and w88 College Team
In the argumentative speech session, the first argument of the affirmative side first stated the argument, pointing out that "justice should be pursued to seek profits" in compliance with the requirements of the times, which means seeking reasonable and legal "profits" under the premise of complying with legal norms, thus clearly stating his own point of view: "justifying justice should seek profits." The opposing side refutes the other party's views in its argumentative statement, quoting Confucius' famous saying "A gentleman is understood by righteousness, and a villain is understood by benefit" to support his own argument, and "speak with facts", pointing out that in today's society, many tragedies caused by utilitarian-oriented social behavior have harmed social order, and concluded that today's society should advocate "justifying justice and not seeking profit."
In the attack and defense session, the second defense of the affirmative raised the sharp question of "whether the victory of the revolution led by the Chinese people under the leadership of the Communist Party of China also benefited the Chinese Communist Party itself", forcing the third defense of the negative side to respond in a "curved way"; The opposing side's second debate also "repairs others with their own treatment", requiring the other side to give a positive answer to the question "Should society promote the behavior of clearly marked prices or the act of justice without seeking personal gain?", allowing the opposing debater to find another battlefield and argue from other aspects. The debate deepened step by step and became more and more intense.
The hand-to-hand free attack and defense sessions have climaxes and are exciting. This is a confrontation of lips and tongues, and a contest of wisdom and courage; this is a fierce battlefield and a stage to showcase talents. The two sides of the debate went back and forth, refusing to give in to each other. The debaters used their sharp minds to catch the flaws in the other party's defense, and their repeated rhetorical questions were very powerful. The battle was extremely fierce, and the strong atmosphere of debate took the audience's breath away. The affirmative debater is good at keeping in touch with current affairs and pointing out the following From "one center, two basic points" to "three benefits", from Deng Xiaoping Theory, the essence of "Three Represents" to establish the party for the public and govern for the people, to the concept of harmonious society in the report of the 17th National Congress, these are all things that "righteousness" and "seeking benefit", seeking the benefit of the people of the country, and all of this is the driving force for social progress. The debaters on the opposing side are good at quoting classics and tracing back to the source, emphasizing that "justifying one's righteousness without seeking profit" comes from Dong Zhongshu's famous saying in "Chun Qiu Fan Lu" "A benevolent person, correcting one's righteousness without seeking benefits, and repairing one's principles without considering merit." "Profit" here refers to personal self-interest; and the expansion of self-interest leads to moral corruption and social decline. Therefore, personal self-interest must not be used as the starting point for action, but a noble moral standard should be promoted. Both sides had rich arguments, sufficient arguments, and extensive quotations. Each had its own merits. The fierce debate infected everyone present. The second defense of the affirmative side was quick in thinking, quick in response, witty and witty, and won rounds of applause for its witty rhetorical questions; the first defense of the negative side was calm, calm, and persuasive; the second defense used analogies and won applause with the example of Apple.
In the concluding speech session, the opposition adopted various strategies to refute the opponent's four arguments one by one, and concluded with200814944_15152
A warm little episode appeared at this time: Due to the fierce rhetoric during the free debate, the four opponents apologized to the four advocates for their improper wording. Their sincerity won the tolerance of the other party and the understanding applause of the audience. The atmosphere at the scene was warm and harmonious.
The audience actively participated in the live question-and-answer session and asked questions enthusiastically. There were many secret debate masters among them, and their highly speculative questions won applause from everyone. The debaters also answered the questions patiently and carefully.
Audience questions
It is worth mentioning that another highlight of this game is the exhibition match, in which five boys played against five girls. The pro-girl group argued on the topic "Boys should take the initiative first when it comes to falling in love", while the male opposition group took the opposite position: "Girls should take the initiative first when falling in love." The debaters on both sides were well prepared, and their words were humorous and often hidden, making the competition lively and yet intense. The applause and laughter of the audience intertwined and became the main theme of the exhibition game.
In the comment session, the judges expressed their excitement and pointed out that passion is the external manifestation of the debate, while rational thinking and expression are the inner core of the debate. He affirmed the rationality of the debate topic, praised the performance of both parties, and gave suggestions: debaters should pay attention to the traps hidden behind the other party's language, go beyond the opponent's topic and directly enter their own topic, and enhance their ability to control the situation and adapt to the situation. Everyone benefited a lot from the judges’ comments and felt a lot.
Judges’ comments
After judging by the audience and judges, Qin Jiameng, the second defender of the affirmative, was awarded the title of the best debater, and the w88 casino of Law won the crown of this championship competition.
Finally, the closing ceremony of the first w88 casino Debate Competition was held grandly. Ten students from various departments won the title of "Best Debater". The w88 casino of Information, w88 casino of English, w88 casino of Foreign Languages, w88 casino of Chinese Language, w88 casino of Public Administration and w88 casino of Insurance won the title of Outstanding Group. The w88 casino of Business and w88 casino of Finance won the third prize. The w88 casino of Economics and w88 won the second prize. The w88 casino of Law won the championship.
The champion of this debate—the law w88 casino team
Amid passion and emotion, laughter and applause, the first w88 casino Debate Competition came to an end.
