w88 casino News Network (Special Correspondent Yu Hehuan)11month16日At 7 p.m., the whole w88 casino debate competition hosted by the Law w88 casinoBGroup semifinals in Ningyuan526The curtain opens. The two strong teams that reached the semi-finals were the Institute of Economics and w88 and the Institute of Finance. The Institute of Economics and w88 sent four debaters, Wu Xiaolin, Meng Ran, Wang Jingxiao, and Yan Zheming. As the opponent, the Institute of Finance sent debaters Wang Kui, Li Feifei, Wang Jiaqi, and Zheng Wenyang. The affirmative argument is that "where a journey goes is more important than who you go with", while the opponent's argument is that "who you go with on a journey is more important than where you go."
We invited people from the Law w88 casino for this debateSun LiTeacher,Liu YannanTeacher and English w88 casinoZhang LihuaThe teacher serves as the judge. The atmosphere was already quite heated before the debate officially started. The audience supporting both sides were very enthusiastic, which was in great contrast with the howling cold wind outside. The debaters' gearing up undoubtedly raised the temperature in the classroom by a few points.
When the competition officially begins, the positive side will first make a statement. The affirmative's first debate has a well-organized thinking, and the argumentative statement starting from the definition of the concept lays an excellent foundation for the subsequent affirmative's debate. The opposing side also performed well in its first argument. He first refuted the affirmative's submissions and then settled on the "important" criterion, which was equally thoughtful. During the attack and defense stage, the debaters from both sides showed their sharp minds. The affirmative used Sima Qian as an example to argue that direction is more important than traveling companions, while the negative asked the affirmative to argue that "those who are close to Mo must not be black." The two sides fought hard to separate each other.
The free debate stage was still expected to be the climax of the entire competition. Both sides cited a large number of examples to prove their views and tried to logically deduce their correctness using the principle of necessary and sufficient conditions. The wonderful free debate brought the atmosphere to a climax. The final concluding remarks are equally classic. The four counter-arguments explain that there must be someone to lead you on the journey of life. Only with people and emotions can you experience life. The four debaters of Zhengfang mentioned in their speech that although there is an old saying "When three people are walking together, there must be my teacher", there is also a famous saying "I love my teacher, but I love the truth even more". Both sides concluded the entire game quite well.
JudgeThe teacher gave a sharp summary.Liu YannanThe teacher commented that this debate topic is quite debatable. "Where to go" and "who to go with" are themselves a "chicken-and-egg" relationship. Although the debaters on both sides performed well, they both had certain shortcomings in knowledge. Both parties should break away from textbooks and dabble more in extracurricular books. Finally,Sun LiThe teacher announced the results of the competition, the final total score of Zhengfang Economics and w88 College233.5points, the total score of the opposing w88 casino of Finance225points, the Economic and w88 Institute won the semi-final and advanced to the final. This debate also made an exception and selected the two best debaters. Yan Zheming won the Best Wisdom Award for the fourth argument for the affirmative, and Wang Kui won the Best Debate Style Award for the first argument against the opponent.
So far, the semi-finals of the debate have ended. The finalists, the Law w88 casino and the w88 casino of Economics and w88, will have a peak showdown, so stay tuned!
Two from the Economic and w88 Institute express their opinions
