w88 casino News Network (Reporter Chen Xiangzhen Davis Wu Huijuan）10month31日夜, the w88 casino Debate Competition hosted by the Youth League Committee and the Student Union of the Law w88 casino Youth League was held in Ningyuan526The curtain opens.
The guests attending this debate include Chen Jianxiang, deputy secretary of the w88 casino party committee, Cao Yahong, deputy secretary of the party branch of the w88 casino of Law, Zhang Zhijuan, deputy secretary of the party branch of the w88 casino of Information, Yan Lihong, secretary of the Communist Youth League of the w88 casino of Law, and Miao Dongqing, secretary of the Communist Youth League of the w88 casino of Information. Le Ping and Ma Wei, teachers from the w88 casino of Humanities, and Matt, teachers from the Law w88 casino, also attended the competition as special judges. The debate scene was full of excitement and excitement; all the debaters were confident and eloquent; the audience was enthusiastic and the seats were packed; the strong lineup of guest seats and judges' seats added a lot to the competition.
Chen Jianxiang said that conducting healthy and active debate competitions is a need to cultivate the excellent qualities of modern students and an inevitable necessity to strengthen the construction of campus culture. At the same time, she also emphasized the important purpose of the debate competition, looked forward to the excellent performance of each college, and wished this series of debate competitions a complete success.
Chen Jianxiang’s speech
The debaters from the w88 casino of Law and the w88 casino of Information launched a fierce competition around the debate topic "Does a person who achieves great things stick to trivial matters?" Suddenly, smoke filled the scene, and the atmosphere gradually heated up. The debaters on both sides were active in thinking, profound in analysis, unique in insights, extremely confident, and spoke endlessly, winning warm applause from the audience.
As the main party, the law w88 casino fully demonstrated their eloquent talents and the potential of excellent lawyers throughout the entire process. They were calm, clear-cut, and had clear opinions. From argument making to public defense, from free debate to concluding remarks, they were busy, not chaotic, and well-organized. They proposed that "big actions should not be taken into consideration, and big gifts should not be ignored." They should not let insignificant trivial matters hinder the pace of success. As the opposition, the w88 casino of Information was naturally unwilling to lag behind and spoke enthusiastically. They were knowledgeable, cited classics and classics, and proposed that "success is determined by small measures, and failure is determined by small measures." Their incisive rebuttals pushed the atmosphere on the court to climax again and again.
Debaters from the w88 casino of Information
Especially during the free debate, the fierceness and tension between the two sides was self-evident. The pen in his hand kept recording and marking on the paper, not letting go of any loopholes of the other party. fromFrom "King Gou Jian of Yue suffered hardship while lying down on his salary", "Han Xin endured the humiliation of his crotch" to "Lian Po took the trouble to plead guilty and achieved peace with the generals", the arguments were strong and logical, and they received nods of approval from the judges, teachers and guests. Especially in the four debates of the square, the difference between "details" and "sections" was drawn from the ballpoint pen in the hand, and the paint peeling off the pen was compared to "sections", and the damage to the ballpoint pen tip was compared to "details". The unique on-the-spot performance won thunderous applause from the audience.
Debaters from the Law w88 casino
At the end of the debate, the students asked the debaters questions about relevant issues in the debate, and the atmosphere was harmonious and lively. Judge Leping fully affirmed and praised the performance of the debaters, butalso pointed out that although the debate was exciting, it only focused on the interpretation of individual words, and neither side discussed the issue in depth.Finally, she announced that the two sides were tied, and the best debater was the affirmative.
The war of words has temporarily come to an end. The impassioned speeches of the debaters are impressive, and the high-spirited style of the students from the University of Business and Economics is extremely exciting.
News network reporters will continue to pay attention to the next games of other colleges, which will be another peak showdown of wisdom!
