w88 casino News（Reporter Zeng Xin Li Yan）11month2Seven o'clock in the evening, the first sessionThe second preliminary round of the w88 casino DebateABThe two groups competed in Ningyuan Building528and526Proceed.
at528The competition in the classroom was between the w88 casino of Foreign Languages and the w88 casino of Insurance. The topic of the debate was "Should university education be market-oriented?" The first is the opening statement. Huang Kai, the first debater from the w88 casino of Foreign Languages, opened the argument by explaining the meaning of key words such as "university education" and "market" in the debate topic, and clearly explained his point of view that "university education should be market-oriented". On the other side, He Bo could not bear to show his weakness, and also put forward the point of view that "university education should not be market-oriented" with a clear argument.
Speech by the w88 casino of Foreign Languages
Speech by Insurance College
The following stages of attack and free debate were very exciting. Both sides quoted from "one center, two basic points" to the employment rate of the University of International w88, from the speech of the Minister of Education to the selection of courses each semester. The wonderful debates made the audience applaud continuously, and there were cheers from time to time. After the final concluding speech, the students took part in questions from the audience, making the atmosphere more lively. After the three judges and teachers commented on the competition, the chairman of the debate announced the final result: the best debater was won by Fu Eyan, the opponent’s third opponent, and the winner was the opponent, the insurance college team.
Judges’ comments
At the same time, separated by a wall526A wonderful showdown is also taking place in the classroom. The two sides of the debate were the w88 casino of English and the w88 casino of Finance. The view of the English w88 casino was that "those who are content are always happy", while the w88 casino of Finance, the opponent's view was that "those who are not satisfied are always happy". They brought an auditory feast to the audience with their eloquence and clear thinking. The first part of the debate was the basic argument. Zheng Fangyi gave a full explanation of the concept of contentment. She pointed out that contentment is a peaceful state of mind and a positive response to the real society. It is a state in which the current situation matches one's own theory. It is clear, well-organized and orderly. At the same time, the opponent argued not to be outdone. His voice was sonorous and powerful, full of passion, and he proposed that the essence of dissatisfaction is not to be complacent and unsatisfied with the status quo, which represents forge ahead and a more positive attitude towards life.
English College Bianshou
The second session of defense was also very exciting. The second debate of the affirmative side cited "Vietnam's military aggression after independence" as an example to refute the opponent's point of view, while the second debate of the negative side also used a progressive questioning method to cleverly attack and defend. These all showed the debaters' quick thinking and extensive knowledge.
Finance College Bianshou
Then the debate reached its climax - sinceDuring the debate session, the atmosphere in the entire arena was very lively, and a heated verbal battle began. Socrates' famous sayings and scholars' theory of "insatiable" human nature. The opposing side used psychology and philosophical knowledge to carefully explain that continuous exploration of the unknown brings happiness to people. The positive side refuted the opponent through the comparison of Liu Bang's campaign and the "inaction" policy, and the summary of the lessons of the decline of national power during the Tang Xuanzong period. During this period, the debaters kept making witty remarks and good sentences. Each of the debaters was quick in thinking, quick in response, wise and humorous, and won warm applause from the audience.
Both sides performed outstandingly in the final concluding remarks. They used their keen eyes to discover the shortcomings and loopholes in the other party's argument, and once again demonstrated their own views. During the audience question and answer session, the audience was enthusiastic, the debaters were humorous, and the atmosphere was relaxed and harmonious.
The judges gave a fair evaluation to this debate. He affirmed the rationality of the debate topic, praised the wonderful performance of both parties, and hoped that everyone will be "contented" in life and never satisfied in work. In the end, the judges announced that the opposing side’s w88 casino of Finance won the competition, and the opposing side’s second debater won the title of “Best Debater” for its keen debating perspective and outstanding debate skills.
The news network will continue to report on the next debate, so stay tuned.
