w88 casino News Network (Reporter Xu Shiqing)5month7日19：00, "Legal Dance for Ten Years, Rhythm Moves the Heart" The 10th Legal Culture Festival's Anglo-American Legal System Moot Court at Ningyuan Building219Hold. The trial of the simulated case is based on the Anglo-American legal system. Both the plaintiff, defendant and judge are composed of law students, and the jury members come from various schools.

Moot court scene

The case revolves around an actor who was in debt due to drug abuse and diagnosed with terminal liver cancerGodyExpand.Godywith daughterSarahGo to the amusement park to ride a roller coaster. After the staff confirms that the instruments display normally and the seat belts are secure,GodyBut he died on the moving roller coaster due to massive head bleeding. Later, it was discovered that the amusement park had passed a bill to cut machine maintenance expenses a year and a half ago on the grounds that there had been no safety incidents. forGodyThe question of whether the Amusement Park Co., Ltd. should be held responsible for the death of 10593_10616|PlaintiffSarahA fierce confrontation began in court with the defendant company.

Plaintiff

Defendant

Both the plaintiff and the defendant presented multiple pieces of evidence identified by specialized agencies, includingGodyProof of extending the loan period, drugs prescribed by the hospital, etc. At this point in the court debate, a controversial point that attracted much attention emerged - the two appraisal reports held by both parties were conflicting. The plaintiff's report showed that the amusement park equipment was in disrepair, was obviously aging, and no longer met national standards. The defendant's report showed that the seat belts on the roller coaster were of normal tightness and there were no safety hazards.

In order to further solve the mystery, the judge approved the witnesses of both parties to appear in court to testify. Whether faced by roller coaster operators, amusement parksCEO, or the deceased's neighbor and family doctor. Lawyers on both sides raced against time to question the witnesses repeatedly. The defendant pointed out the insufficiency of the plaintiff's evidence and believed that the deceased knew that he would not live long and was suspected of blaming his death on the amusement park to obtain compensation to prevent his daughter from being implicated in debts. In his closing statement, he said firmly: "Compassion should not be an obstacle to fairness and justice, and we should not pay for other people's intentional actions." The plaintiff lamented that the small amount of consolation money given by the amusement park was just a show after the agreement. "As long as an employee of a unit commits a dereliction of duty within the scope of his or her duties, the unit should bear the losses caused by the employee's dereliction of duty." The trial of the case progressed in an orderly manner according to regulations, and the words of both parties still accelerated the pace of the scene, and "gunsmoke" spread... After a verbal battle, the jury members deliberated and reached a verdict: the defendant does not need to bear compensation liability to the plaintiff.

For the first Anglo-American legal moot court, Law w88 casino teacher Lu Jiefeng praised the students’ positive performance in it. He commented on the entire case trial process from both procedural and substantive aspects. He said that students should first increase the clarity of whether the case is a civil or criminal case. Cases of both natures have different distribution of the burden of proof and the degree of evidence required. Conviction of criminal crimes requires completely overwhelming evidence, while civil cases require only51%Yes49%can win the case, and the case in this moot court is a civil case; secondly, in the Anglo-American legal system, pastors, doctors, etc. have legally permitted professional ethics, so that they do not need to answer every question raised by lawyers or even judges, and no one has the right to force them to testify; finally, the tort liability law in the United States is not a statutory law, so lawyers The duty of the witness is to speak with cases - similar cases that can support its own claims, cases that may be beneficial to the other party but are not applicable to the current situation. The method of questioning the witness includes not only finding out the problems that have occurred in terms of integrity, but also pointing out the discrepancies between the on-site testimony and the previously submitted written evidence. "In this case, the way the plaintiff refutes the other party is to list the elements of negligence."