w88 casino News Network (Reporter Li Shanjie)11month29日夜7：00，Sponsored by the Committee of the Communist Youth League of the w88 casino and hosted by the Student Union of the Youth League Committee of the Law w88 casinoThe finals of the 4th "Paul Hastings Cup" w88 casino Debate Competition took place in the international conference hall on the third floor of Ningyuan Building. Secretary of the Party Committee of the Law w88 casinoWang Xiaochuan, Deputy SecretaryYan Lihong, Deputy Secretary of the Party Committee of the English w88 casinoXu Wenbing,Deputy Secretary of the Party Committee of the w88 casino of FinanceTeng Yun was invited to attend.Dean of the w88 casino of International RelationsDai Changzheng, Head of the Ideological and Political Education and Research DepartmentRen Li Jingyu, Director of the Propaganda Department of the w88 casino Party CommitteeZhang Xiaofeng, Teacher of Ideological and Political Education and Research DepartmentWang Zhimin、Zhou YumeiServed as a judge for this competition. The presidents of the student unions of each w88 casino, many enthusiastic students from the University of w88 and Economics, and friends from the five sister universities attended the game。

After competing in many games, the w88 casino of Finance and the w88 casino of English embarked on the final journey to win the championship. In this competition, the debate team of Zhengfang w88 casino of Finance believes that college students’ life orientation should be oriented to social needs, while the Anti-Fang English w88 casino believes that college students’ life orientation should be oriented to personal preferences.

After a brief review of the game process,Deputy Secretary of the Party Committee of the Law w88 casinoYan LihongIn her speech, she expressed the hope that the debate competition would help students from Commerce University look at the society, pay attention to reality, face the times, and think about the future, and wished the competition a success.

The players from both sides take their seats and the game officially begins. The two sides debated separately3Minute opening statement. The first argument of the affirmative side is logically clear and calm, while the first argument of the negative side is extremely aggressive, directly pointing out that social needs are vague, unstable and difficult to grasp.

The debate session followed, with both sides constantly raising sharp questions. The pace of the game quickens and the crowd is rapt. Among them, Zhengfang points out that people cannot exist in isolation from society, and social needs should be linked to personal abilities, so social needs vary from person to person. The other side insists that life positioning is not limited to position, but also includes feelings and beliefs. Immediately, the two sides argued and seized on each other's loopholes to refute.

The sudden opposition is the innovative part of this competition. Both sides changed their positions during the four debates, and each brought bursts of laughter to the audience with a humorous speech.

Then, the free debate began and the competition climaxed. Among them, the opposing debaters sharply pointed out that social needs are ambiguous, and life orientation is also a vague topic. Using a vague direction to guide a vague thing will lead people astray. At the end of the free debate, the affirmative asked eight rhetorical questions in a row, which aroused the atmosphere of the audience and won applause from the audience.

The competition is in full swing

At the end of the competition, both sides made their closing speeches. The opposing side's four arguments seized on the other side's loopholes, cited scriptures, and reiterated their own arguments. The four arguments for the affirmative pointed out the conceptual deficiencies of the negative side and stated that the meaning of life should be reflected in the implementation of social responsibility.

Before the results of the competition were officially announced, the audience once again enjoyed a debate feast - the freshman exhibition competition. Eight freshmen from different colleges "360ANDQQThe dispute, whether users benefit" is a fierce debate.

Exhibition matches are equally exciting

After that, the judgesDai ChangzhengThe professor commented on the final. He said that both parties were well prepared and brought a wonderful competition to everyone, and hoped that the debaters could better handle the relationship between knowledge and eloquence and improve their academic realm in the future.

The winners of various awards in this w88 casino debate competition have finally been announced. In this final, the debate team of the w88 casino of Finance won the championship,The best debater is the English CollegeJia Weichao.

The guests presented awards to the representatives of the w88 casino of Finance and the best debaters of the winning team

Winner list of the 4th w88 casino Debate Competition

First Prize: w88 casino of Finance

Second Prize: w88 casino of English

Third Prize: Law w88 casino andw88 casino of International Economics and w88

Excellent Organization Award:w88 casino of International Economics and w88, w88 casino of Finance, w88 casino of Information

Best debater: Qin Fang from the w88 casino of English, Yang Qianshuo from the w88 casino of International Relations, Xiao Yao from the Business w88 casino, Wei Haoran from the w88 casino of Finance, Wei Yushu from the w88 casino of Foreign Languages, Zhang Yixin from the Chinese w88 casino, Chen Yi from the w88 casino of Information, Ma Yingnan from the w88 casino of Law,w88 casino of International Economics and w88Cui Jiaqi

Excellence Award: w88 casino of Insurance, w88 casino of International Relations, w88 casino of International Business, w88 casino of Public Administration, w88 casino of Foreign Languages, w88 casino of Chinese Language, w88 casino of Information