w88 casino News Network (Internship Reporter Congratulations)10month30Sunday 7pm, The second game of the third "East Asia International Cup" w88 casino Debate Competition was wonderfully staged. The two sides in this game were the w88 casino of Insurance and the w88 casino of English. The topic of this debate is "Is it a devaluation of talents or an innovation in career choices for college students to be nannies?". The w88 casino of English holds the positive view that "it is a devaluation of talents for college students to be nannies." The w88 casino of Insurance holds the negative view that "it is an innovation in career choice for college students to be nannies."

After the debaters of both sides are in place, the pros and cons will debate first3Minute of argument. Both sides showed eloquent arguments at the beginning. In the first argument of the affirmative side, Wang Qing elaborated and analyzed issues such as the definition of "nanny" and the definition of "value". In the first argument of the opposing side, Lin Huan put forward the view that "the employment of college students should comply with market demand." Then came the attack and defense session. First, Du Jingwen, the second defender for the affirmative, asked Peng Sai, the second defender for the negative side. In his answer, Peng Sai quoted Lei Feng's words, "We are all screws, and we will rush wherever we are needed." He demonstrated that the value of college students as nannies is reflected in meeting market needs, rather than devaluing talents, which attracted warm applause from the audience. In the wonderful confrontation between Jia Weichao, the third advocate for the affirmative, and Huang Zhichao, the third advocate for the negative, the momentum and demeanor of the two made the students in the audience marvel. In this round, the debaters from both sides asked sharp questions, answered witty questions, and summarized concisely and clearly. The whole debate scene gradually heated up.

After a few minutes of attack and defense, the competition reached its climax - free debate. Among them, the affirmative debater focused on the value gap between "the state invests heavily in training college students and college students who just work as nannies" to explain in a clear and logical manner; while the negative debater firmly grasped the loopholes and logical errors in the affirmative debater's words to attack, while not forgetting to cite examples such as Wal-Mart to prove their point of view. In this round of debate, the debaters from both sides faced each other tit for tat, reacted quickly, and thought carefully. Sparks of thinking were sparked in the battle of words.

Both parties7The minutes of free debate passed unknowingly, and the debaters were still unfinished. Finally, both sides made four concluding remarks. Shen Fangyi, the fourth defender of the negative side, spoke first. She first raised four questions about the views and arguments of the affirmative side, and then briefly summarized her own point of view, and wrote a poem at the end, which won rounds of applause from the audience. Xie Xinchen, the fourth debater of the positive side, also questioned the arguments of the negative side before summarizing her own views, and gave a methodical argument with strict logic, which was also praised by the audience.