w88 casino News Network (ReporterLi Binbin PhotographyJade Lord)5month26日夜6point, the first "Debate Hot Issues" hosted by the w88 casino news network On Scientific Development" online debate finals were successfully held in the Chengxin three-story international conference hall. From28The Youth Research Club team and the w88 casino of Finance debate that stood out among the teams1The team conducted a wonderful and fierce live debate, and the final debate was at the w88 casino of Finance1The team won the online debate championship in one fell swoop. Ye Wenlou, director of the Scientific Research Department, Yang Xiaoping, director of the Development Planning Department, Wang Tao, deputy director of the Organization Department of the Party Committee, Zhao Hongtao, deputy secretary of the Party Branch of the w88 casino of International Economics and w88, and Mei Tao, deputy director of the Network and Educational Technology Center, served as the final judges.
The first “Debate Hot Issues Online debate competition on scientific development has been held since its inception3Online debate,2live debate, lasted30Yu Tian. Debate between the Youth Research Society Team and the w88 casino of Finance1Two teams passed by4After a fierce battle, we finally got a ticket to the finals. At the debate site, the two sides had an impassioned debate on "whether Chinese universities currently need to be ranked." The exchange of wisdom and eloquence made the debate particularly exciting.
The positive view held by the Youth Research Team is that "Chinese universities currently need to be ranked", and the opposing team debates at the w88 casino of Finance1The team holds the view that "currently Chinese universities do not need to be ranked." In the opening argument, Zhengfang first pointed out that ranking is an objective evaluation system, which is needed by reality and can promote the development of university education science. At present, the level of higher education in our country is not high and funds are limited. The implementation of rankings is conducive to the country's hierarchical and focused support for the development of higher education. This is an important reason for the existence of rankings. At the same time, rankings make it easier for the people to understand the development status and approaches of higher education, provide a competitive incentive mechanism for colleges and universities, and are also a reference for the government's macro-decision-making. These necessities also support Zhengfang's point of view. However, the opposition pointed out that the ranking issue should be considered from a social perspective and comprehensively considered. The current evaluation standards for university rankings are not unified and the information is not disclosed, which makes the rankings lack credibility; each university has its own characteristics, which cannot be reflected in the rankings. On the contrary, the rankings will lead to phenomena such as list economy and academic misconduct.
After clearly stating their respective views, the two sides chose the other party’s second and third defense respectively for question and answer. The four players from both sides made full use of the pre-match preparation materials to support their respective views with examples, data, etc. The arguments of both sides are closely related to study and life. The debaters' series of rhetorical questions often win warm applause from the audience, and their humorous words from time to time bring bursts of laughter to the scene. In the summary of the attack and defense, the affirmative side concluded that rankings are not numerical but diversified, while the negative side exaggerated the shortcomings of the ranking system and had a narrow and incomplete concept. The opposition, on the other hand, refutes its opponents by holding on to viewpoints such as "rankings are attractive to readers but cannot represent needs" and "how do rankings use numbers to reflect the characteristics of universities?"
In fierce10In the minute-long free debate session, the two sides engaged in a fierce "debate" between you and me. The affirmative's questions were aggressive, and the negative's answers were clever and witty. However, both sides pressed forward step by step, seizing on the other's loopholes to criticize. There was constant applause and climaxes.
After the intense free debate, both sides reorganized their thinking and made concluding remarks. Opponents once again pointed out the shortcomings of the ranking system's non-disclosure of information and the inability of quantitative indicators to reflect the characteristics of the w88 casino. They also believed that a truly scientific system is needed to evaluate universities. Zhengfang pointed out that the concept of ranking is generally popular in various regions today and is the inevitable trend of the times, and reiterated the view that one should not abandon food for fear of choking and generalize.
During the deliberation stage when the judges left their seats, both sides of the debate answered questions from the audience and put forward their own views on certain specific issues. At the same time, the two teams also conducted an interesting debate on the topic "EQANDIQWhich price is higher? ". The debaters once again competed with their intelligence and sharp wit, and a variety of examples and metaphors made the debate interesting.
Wang Tao, deputy director of the Organization Department of the Party Committee, pointed out in his comments that both parties had excellent performances in the debate, but there were still deficiencies in conceptual positioning and analytical methods. Zhao Hongtao, deputy secretary of the Party Branch of the w88 casino of International Economics and w88, commented that he hoped that the contestants should determine the central words and make full use of time when reviewing the questions; at the same time, they should also pay attention to the cultivation and shaping of teamwork skills and temperament.
Comments by Wang Tao, Vice Minister of the Organization Department of the Party Committee
Comments by Zhao Hongtao, Deputy Secretary of the Party Branch of the w88 casino of International Economics and w88
Finally, Finance Academy Debate1The team won the first "Debating Hot Issues" with its rich knowledge accumulation, excellent debating skills and good teamwork. On Scientific Development" online debate competition champion, Qi Jichen, the second debater on the team, won the title of "Best Debater".
