w88 casino News Network (Reporter Liu Xiaojie)3month12日夜6Points30Points, the "Fourth House Joint Debate Invitational Competition" jointly organized by the Student Union of the College of Economics and w88 and the Student Union of the w88 casino of Law was held in Ningyuan Building628Wonderful presentation.
In the first debate, the representatives of the w88 casino of Insurance and the w88 casino of Economics and w88 acted as pros and cons respectively. The topic of the debate was "Should the price of train tickets be increased during the Spring Festival?" The insurance representatives of the positive side advocated a price increase, while the negative side believed that the price should not be increased. After the humorous self-introductions of both teams, the debate officially kicked off.
The first argument of both sides was clear and rich in content: the affirmative side proposed that price increases are the inevitable result of economic laws, railway transportation companies should be profitable, and price increases are conducive to the balanced development of multiple modes of transportation. Several reasons to support their views; the negative side did not show any weakness in the first argument. She stated that simple price increases cannot completely solve the current situation of railway transportation congestion, but will increase the economic burden of ordinary people and other reasons to explain the view that train tickets should not increase.
The opposing side makes its first argument
In the second session of the one-on-one debate, the two sides exchanged words in the second and third debates, fully demonstrating the charm of the debate to the audience. They raised a series of related issues such as institutional reform, economic laws, and social nature on whether train fares should rise. They launched a fierce debate and won rounds of applause from the audience.
In the summary statement of the third link, both sides supplemented and summarized their own views and further refuted the weak links of the other side's views. The most lively atmosphere at the scene was undoubtedly the free debate in the fourth session. The contestants on both sides were full of passion, tit for tat, and showed no weakness to each other. The contestants' witty remarks often won rounds of applause, and the audience responded enthusiastically. The closing speeches of both sides in the last four debates in the last session were equally impressive, bringing the night's debate to a perfect end.
Summary of the affirmative’s four arguments
After the entire debate, the judges commented on the performance of both parties. The judges pointed out that the contestants of both teams were all freshmen. Their performance was remarkable, but they also had problems such as lack of experience. They hoped that they could make greater progress in debate in the future. In the end, the opposing team from the w88 casino of Economics and w88 won the debate.
The debate on "Should private detectives be legalized" between the w88 casino of Law and the w88 casino of Finance in the second session was equally exciting, and was ultimately won by the Law w88 casino team.
