w88 casino News Network (Internship Reporter Li Chao）10month28Seven o'clock in the evening, the sixth match of the "China Merchants Bank Cup" Second w88 casino Debate Competition hosted by the Youth League Committee and the Student Union of the Law w88 casino Youth League was held in Ningyuan728A grand opening. The contestants on both sides of this debate were from the w88 casino of Insurance and the w88 casino of Foreign Languages. The two participating teams have achieved impressive results in the previous stage of the competition, and both teams have sent out teams that won the previous stage
The contestant who won the title of "Best Debater" made the debate climax climax after another, and the atmosphere was tense and warm.
The judges for this competition include Su Haopeng, director of the Civil Law Department of the Law w88 casino, Ning Hongli, a teacher of the Law w88 casino, and Zhou Yumei, a teacher of the w88 casino of Humanities. This competition launched a fierce debate on "the pros and cons of netizens' occupying the right to speak on the construction of public opinion." Zhengfang Insurance College's view is that "the pros and cons of netizens' occupying the right to speak outweigh the cons on the construction of public opinion." The w88 casino of Foreign Languages holds the opposite view. Both teams were fully prepared and their speeches were clear and well-founded, winning applause from the audience.
In the first round, the affirmative spoke first, pointing out that the active participation of netizens and the courage to discover and expose can enable the Chinese people to understand the truth more directly and comprehensively, and use the results of the incident to clarify the role of netizens in modern public opinion. The important position in the construction further illustrates the "profit"; the opposition did not show weakness in its first argument, and its words came close to the loopholes in the affirmative's first argument. "The opinions of netizens can only represent the opinions of a few people. Can it mean that all 1.3 billion of us are speaking?"
The positive question is strong
The opposition responded forcefully
The debate in the attack and defense sessions became more intense. The second defense debater won the championship in the "Beijing University Military Debate Competition" last year07Ma Jiacheng, a top player, impressed the audience with his rigorous and sharp questions and passionate and high-pitched tone. However, Wang Jiangchuan, the second defender of the opposing side who was asked the question, also performed well. His powerful voice and confident and relaxed defense also won bursts of applause and screams. In this link, square08Ke Boyi, the top contestant, was asked twice, but he spoke fluently and acted calmly. He profoundly discussed the important role of netizens in expressing public opinions and other aspects. He also proposed that "although the system for netizens to express their opinions is not complete, the developing network system still brings us many benefits."
After the most exciting free debate began, the four debate contestants from both sides who had not spoken one after another spoke. The pros and cons also proposed more definitions at the same time, and conducted in-depth and rigorous discussions on what netizens are, whether their free speech is true and credible, and what class the netizens belong to and what representativeness they have. The clear thinking and rigorous words of both parties won bursts of applause from the audience. During the free debate, the two teams constantly adjusted the scope of topics and the direction of the debate, and the atmosphere was warm and lively.
The final concluding remarks began with the four opposing arguments. She once again pointed out the narrow definitions and false data given by the affirmative during the debate, emphasized the possible adverse effects of irresponsible remarks by netizens, and reiterated the many shortcomings of netizens occupying the right to speak. The affirmative first clarified the important role of netizens in occupying the right to speak. The following "Ten Questions to Debate Friends" progressed step by step and were completed in one go, more powerfully supporting their own views.
During the discussion when the judges left the table, the audience actively interacted with the contestants, triggering heated discussions on and off the court about the authenticity of free speech by netizens and the definition of class among netizens.
Su Haopeng, director of the Civil Law Department of the Law w88 casino, made the final comments. He pointed out that there were many vague concepts in the topic of this debate, which made it difficult to understand, but the two participating teams still performed well; both teams in this competition were relatively young and energetic, but they were a little too excited during the debate. Then the host announced the results of the competition: the w88 casino of Insurance won the competition, and Wang Jiangchuan, the second debater of the w88 casino of Foreign Languages, won the title of "Best Debater".
After the debate, the reporter interviewed the contestants. The contestants were in a relaxed mood. They said that the result of the competition was important, but enjoying the process of debate was the most enjoyable thing!
Contestants take photos with judges
