w88 casino News Network (Internship Reporter Zhi Jingya)10month27Seven o'clock in the evening, the fifth match of the "China Merchants Bank Cup" Second w88 casino Debate Competition hosted by the Youth League Committee and the Student Union of the w88 casino of Law Youth League - the match between the w88 casino of Economics and Business and the Chinese w88 casino was held in Ningyuan Building828The classroom begins.

The judges for this competition are Zhuang Hongyan, Secretary of the Youth League of the w88 casino of Finance, Li Haiying, a teacher from the w88 casino of Humanities, and Cai Yinghui, a teacher from the w88 casino of Insurance. The positive view is that "foreign culture does more harm than good to the development of national culture", while the negative view is that "foreign culture does more harm than good to the development of national culture." The discussions between the two sides were thorough and witty, which fully demonstrated the eloquence and eloquence of the students from the w88 casino of Economics and w88 and the w88 casino of Chinese Language.

In the opening argument section, the affirmative first made a statement, pointing out the point of view of "drawing on the strengths of others and making use of them". Subsequently, the opposing side elaborated on the huge role that national culture plays in a nation and the impact of foreign culture on national culture.

In the fierce attack and defense session, the opposing side emphasized that foreign culture does more harm than good to the development of national culture. However, this does not mean that foreign culture has no merit. The second argument for the affirmative also answered one by one the questions raised by the second argument for the negative regarding suits, Microsoft copyright and other foreign cultural invasions. Afterwards, the pros and cons were heatedly debated around the fact that few Manchus could speak Manchu. The scene of the attack and debate session was lively and the debaters were full of passion.

The questions and answers from both sides are analyzed in detail, bringing the debate to the climax of the free debate. In this session, the four debaters of the affirmative changed their angles and raised the question "Is Chinese culture good or bad for foreign cultures?", setting off another round of debate climax. Subsequently, both sides gave examples from real life to vividly and convincingly explain their views. The debaters responded dialectically to the questions raised by the other party, and seized on the loopholes in the other debater's arguments to illustrate their own points. At the same time, the audience was also in high spirits and applauded thunderously on the field.

In the conclusion stage of the four defenses of the affirmative and negative sides, the negative side once again emphasized the various disadvantages of foreign culture on the development of national culture in their statements, and refined and sublimated the negative side's views. The affirmative also quoted classics, made his statement in a rhythmic manner, and ended with a humorous classic statement, which brought a perfect end to the exciting debate.

While the judges discussed the results of the competition, the audience asked high-quality and valuable questions to both sides. The debaters were calm and calm in the face of difficult questions, and all gave clear and clear answers.

Li Haiying, a teacher from the w88 casino of Humanities, first commented on this debate. She objectively evaluated the performance of the two teams, denied the "either-or" view, and emphasized the idea that Chinese and Western cultures should be combined with each other. She said that only what belongs to the nation belongs to the world. Contemporary college students should build self-confidence based on their locality and nation, and at the same time humbly accept foreign cultures. Later, Zhuang Hongyan, Secretary of the Youth League of the w88 casino of Finance, and Cai Yinghui, a teacher of the w88 casino of Insurance, also expressed their views on this debate.