w88 casino News Network (provided by the Law w88 casino)On the afternoon of October 30, 2025, the 48th "International w88 casino Law w88 casino Student Legal Salon" sponsored by the w88 casino of Law and the editorial department of "International w88 casino Law" was successfully held in Room 232, Ningyuan Building.
This salon continues the theme discussion format and conducts in-depth discussions around "the rights and wrongs of 'prepared dishes' from the perspective of multiple stakeholders." In the early stage, a total of 28 students submitted relevant papers. After selection, Du Mingyan and Sun Zhenyu were selected as keynote speakers. The event invited Dr. Li Mingxiao and Dr. Huang Yi to serve as commentators. Professor Feng Hui from the Law w88 casino attended the meeting to provide guidance.
At the beginning of the event, classmate Sun Zhenyu gave a speech on the theme of "Comparison of Prepared Dishes Regulations in China and the United States". He pointed out that my country currently focuses on ensuring the bottom line of food safety, but there are problems such as vague conceptual definitions and insufficient regulatory connection. Based on the national conditions of my country's prepared vegetable industry, he proposed to build a regulatory framework that "gives priority to safety and takes into account efficiency", including unifying the definition standards of prepared dishes, establishing a multi-departmental collaborative supervision platform, and improving channels for consumer complaints and rights protection. After Sun Zhenyu’s speech, the participating students started a discussion based on “Supervision of Prepared Dishes Industry Standards” and “Fulfillment of Sellers’ Notification Obligation”.
Dr. Li Mingxiao and Dr. Huang Yi then commented on Sun Zhenyu’s sharing. Dr. Huang Yi recognized the value of comparative law research and believed that it systematically sorted out the regulatory differences between China and the United States and provided a clear reference for the improvement of my country's system. He also emphasized that the origin and classification of the concept of "prepared dishes" should be studied in depth. Dr. Li Mingxiao affirmed that the framework of the paper is comprehensive and suggested that it should be further combined with the revision of my country's "Food Safety Law" to make the system recommendations more legislatively adaptable.
Next, classmate Du Mingyan launched a discussion focusing on "Research on Intellectual Property Protection Issues of Pre-made Dish Formulas". She explained that as prepared dishes have transformed from an emerging concept to a daily consumer category and its industrial scale has expanded rapidly, formulas, as the core competitive resources of enterprises, are facing legal difficulties such as frequent infringements and blurred protection boundaries. There are conflicts between patent authorization and the short life cycle of prepared dishes, conflicts between w88 secret protection and consumers’ right to know, and the risk of leaks in industry chain collaboration. She combined the characteristics of the prepared vegetable industry and put forward optimization suggestions from the perspectives of jurisprudence and intellectual property law. After Du Mingyan’s speech, the students present started an interactive exchange, and Du Mingyan responded to the questions one by one.
Subsequently, Dr. Li Mingxiao and Dr. Huang Yi commented on Du Mingyan’s speech. Dr. Li Mingxiao affirmed the practical significance of the research and believed that the topic selection of the paper was novel and innovative. At the same time, he suggested that the demonstration process should be further enriched and the relationship between disclosed formulas and commercial infringement should be studied in depth. Dr. Huang Yi believes that the paper has clear logic and focuses on the introduction of the paper, emphasizing the reasons and significance of intellectual property protection for prepared dish recipes, and emphasizing analysis from the perspective of multiple stakeholders, which not only protects the basic rights and interests of consumers, but also maintains the innovation power of enterprises.
This salon provided an in-depth analysis of the focus of legal disputes in the field of prepared dishes through keynote speeches, on-site interactions, and doctoral comments. It not only gave students a more comprehensive understanding of related issues, but also pointed out the direction for subsequent academic research and practical exploration. The salon ended successfully in a strong academic atmosphere and positive exchanges and interactions.(Written by: Xue Yisa Reviewed by: Feng Hui)
