w88 casino News Network (Submission from Law w88 casino)Recently, the General Meeting of Members of the Administrative Law Research Association of the China Law Society and the 2023 Annual Meeting were grandly held in Guangzhou. This annual conference is hosted by the Administrative Law Research Society of the China Law Society and hosted by Guangdong University of Foreign Studies. The theme of the conference is "Innovative Development of Administrative Law and Administrative Law in the New Era". Leaders from the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, the China Law Society, the Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the Ministry of Justice, the Political and Legal Affairs Committee of the Guangdong Provincial Committee and other departments come from Peking University, Tsinghua University, Renmin University of China, China University of Political Science and Law, Party w88 casino of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (National Academy of Administration), Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, More than 700 people, including experts and scholars from universities and scientific research institutions such as Wuhan University, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, East China University of Political Science and Law, Northwest University of Political Science and Law, and Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, as well as legal service institutions such as China Legal Services Hong Kong and Beijing Guantao Zhongmao Law Firm, gathered together to participate in the grand event.

The opening ceremony of the conference was hosted by Professor Yan Xiangbin, President of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies. Wang Qijiang, member of the Party Leadership Group and Vice President of the China Law Society, He Xiaorong, member of the Party Leadership Group and Vice President of the Supreme People's Court, Yuan Gujie, Member of the Standing Committee of the Guangdong Provincial Committee, Secretary of the Political and Legal Affairs Committee, and President of the Guangdong Provincial Law Society, Shi Youqi, Secretary of the Party Committee and Professor of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, and Ma Huaide, President and Professor of China University of Political Science and Law, Vice President of the China Law Society, and President of the Administrative Law Research Society of the China Law Society, delivered speeches successively.

After the opening ceremony, the ninth general meeting of the Administrative Law Research Society of the China Law Society reviewed and approved the work report and financial report of the eighth council of the Administrative Law Research Society of the China Law Society, and carried out the re-election process in accordance with the approval decision of the China Law Society. After voting by the members present, the meeting adopted the "Election Methods for the Ninth General Meeting of Members", the list of scrutineers and counters for this election, and the "Decision on Amending the Articles of Association". The ninth council members of the Administrative Law Research Society of China Law Society were elected through voting.Professor Zheng Yafang and Associate Professor Kong Xiangwen of the Department of Constitutional Law and Administrative Law of our college were elected as directors of the ninth council of the Administrative Law Research Society of the China Law Society.Professor Ma Huaide was elected as the Chairman of the Ninth Council of the Administrative Law Research Society of China Law Society after voting by the Board of Directors.

This annual meeting has five sub-forums. In the second unit of the third sub-forum "Substantial Resolution of Administrative Disputes, Public Interest Litigation and Administrative Prosecution", Professor Zheng Yafang gave a report entitled "Functional Positioning of Administrative Procuratorial Prosecution with Chinese Characteristics". She pointed out that the functional positioning of administrative prosecution is a prerequisite for the theoretical construction of administrative prosecution, and research on this should be rethought from the perspectives of the constitutional and organizational legal basis of administrative prosecution, and the particularity of administrative prosecution power. She believes that the functional positioning of administrative prosecution within the framework of administrative relief is to maintain the objective legal order, and from the perspective of national governance, the core function is to test whether the operation of the law conforms to the will of the party and the country. The current main legal basis for administrative prosecution is based on general clauses, which cannot provide specific normative guidance for the smooth implementation of administrative prosecution work. The systematization and integration of administrative prosecution work depends on the formulation of the Basic Law on Administrative Prosecution, which requires special attention to the scope of administrative prosecutorial supervision, the improvement of administrative prosecutorial supervision procedures, and the connection between administrative prosecutorial supervision and other supervision methods.

In the first unit of the second sub-forum "Digital Government Construction and Administrative Rule of Law", Associate Professor Kong Xiangwen served as a reviewer and reviewed the "Typed Governance of Personal Information Transmission between State Agencies" written by Luo Ying, deputy secretary of the Party Committee and associate professor of Hunan University Law w88 casino. He believes that the topic selection of "Typed Governance of Personal Information Transmission between State Agencies" is of great value. Existing research has paid little attention to the risks of personal information rights and interests behind data sharing. Luo Ying's legal hermeneutic analysis of intergovernmental data sharing behavior under the framework of administrative law and personal protection law is very meaningful, and the legality control scheme proposed is also a great contribution. Secondly, he raised three points of reflection. First, in terms of qualitative aspects, there is still room for discussion in characterizing the processing of personal information by state agencies, including transmission, as factual behavior; second, in terms of the analytical framework, characterizing data sharing only as "transfer" under the Personal Protection Law has certain limitations, and attention must be paid to the utilization behavior of other state agencies after the transfer; third, what is fictitious is not so much the informed consent rule, but rather the purpose limitation principle. The definition of key elements in the purpose limitation principle will have a great impact on the limits of intergovernmental data sharing. Finally, he also proposed that digital and the rule of law are two-way couplings, deeply interactive, and mutually reinforcing.

Man Yishan, a lecturer in the Department of Constitutional Law and Administrative Law of the Law w88 casino, and some doctoral and master students in the department participated in this meeting.