w88 casino News Network (Internship Reporter Li Yingyu)He is good at fierce battles with his lips and tongue, and competes with his teeth alone.11month25日夜19:00, the final of the 7th "Paul Hastings Cup" w88 casino debate competition was held in the integrity three-story international conference hall of w88 casino. Thirty days, twelve colleges, and ten games, two top schools—the w88 casino of Information and the w88 casino of Insurance—stand out from the crowd and take the field again to discuss "whether online spectatorship can help solve hot social issues." Not afraid of attack and defense, and talking about all kinds of life, the w88 casino of Information won the first place with tacit cooperation, and the w88 casino of Insurance achieved second place,Du Yiming won the best debater award.

After the video presentation and self-introduction, the final horn sounded. In the argumentative speech session, Cheng Zihe, a debater from Zhengfang w88 casino of Information, first cracked the three links of "online spectatorship" from exposure, understanding and problem solving under the pressure of public opinion, and pointed out that the positive significance of "online spectatorship" should not be unilaterally denied. Zhong Kexin, the first debater from the Insurance College of the opposing party, took his time and analyzed the three major characteristics of "online onlookers": emotionality, transience and transferability, and lack of mobility, and objectively and rigorously discussed the limitations of "online onlookers".

In the attack and defense session, Zhu Runge for the affirmative defended against Haibin for the opposing side. Zhu Runge compared the solution of the "drug" problem by "police crackdown on drug dealers" to the solution of "social hot spots" by "online onlookers", and his thinking was clear and meticulous; Haibin fought back against the persistence of "online onlookers" and mentioned the sharp example of the reinstatement of officials involved in cross-provincial cases, showing the vivid charm of facts. Huang Xiaoqing argued for the affirmative against Du Yiming, arguing for the negative. Huang Xiaoqing believed that multiple channels are better than a single channel, and his unique perspective opened up a new perspective on the debate. Du Yiming was calm and composed during the rebuttal. When discussing the issue of malicious emotions disrupting social order, he quoted from many sources, which reflected his knowledgeable debating style and won rounds of applause from the students present.

After the summary of the attack and defense, the two sides entered the most intense free debate session,4Minutes of close combat, from redefining the standards of the debate to questioning the accuracy of the examples, from the witticism of "real gold is not afraid of fire, and honest officials are not afraid of onlookers" to the whims of "cousin" picking off watches and naked cigarettes to change cigarette shells, from the clever metaphor of "pulling the trigger" to the precise enumeration of numbers. Each debater relied on their witty on-the-spot performance to stick to their own camp, moving with emotion and understanding with reason.

In the final summary speech session of the competition, Zhao Suyu, the four defenders of the affirmative, and Zhang Zhenyu, the fourth opponent of the opposition, each summarized their opinions. Zhang Zhenyu reiterated the importance of practice and pointed out that the realization of the Chinese Dream requires bit by bit action; while Zhao Suyu once again emphasized that in the Internet age, everyone does not need to become a grassroots hero, but must dare to make a true voice.

Subsequently, the audience interacted with the contestants by asking questions, which generated more sparks of collision of ideas.

Professor Wang Zhimin Commentary Contest

In the judges’ comment session, Professors Wang Zhimin, Tan Youzhi, and Zheng Haiping made comments respectively, and Professor Wang Zhimin set the questionsIn view of the possibility of debate from multiple angles, Professor Tan Youzhi advocated an open mind to understand the key word "hot spot". Professor Zheng Haiping started from the practical significance of the debate topic and encouraged the students present to actively "watch" and "watch" rationally even if the system is not perfect.

Group photo of the best debater winners

This debate competition is sponsored by the University Committee of the Communist Youth League of International Business and Economics and hosted by the Student Union of the Youth League Committee of the Law w88 casino. Guests attending the competition were Yan Lihong, deputy secretary of the Party Committee of the w88 casino of Law, and Ru Luheng, secretary of the Youth League Committee of the w88 casino of Insurance.