There have always been three views on TOEFL reading question tactics. Students with strong learning ability and active thinking will respond to it"Scorn" and think that the question sea tactic is "TOEFL poison"; for students with weak learning ability and strong dependence, the question sea tactic is almost a life-saving straw that they desperately grasp, the elixir of high scores; and for students who are stuck in the middle, the question sea tactic can be said to be "always away from it", like a piece of chicken ribs, it is a pity to abandon it, and it is tasteless...
As we all know, question sea tactics are not only used in the TOEFL world, but also in the entire study and examination classThe "originator" learning method. Its existence is reasonable, not to mention it is a question-sea tactic that has been tested by countless mathematicians! The mixed opinions on the "question sea tactic" actually stem from the diversity of the question sea tactic itself in the minds of students. Below, the TOEFL reading experts will tell you what the question sea should look like and how to correctly use the question sea tactics to get twice the result with half the effort!
What should the question sea look like?
In order to clarify this common misunderstanding in learning, we must first correct a concept: a large number of questions does not mean a large number of questions.
"Amazing super-speed learning experience!" has accumulated more than 100,000 reads on major platforms! ! Completion within one yearAll 33 courses in computer science at MIT! ! There is a clear description in "Translated from the Translation":
Doing exercises can greatly improve your knowledge understanding. However, if you're not careful, you can fall into two efficiency traps:
1. Not getting immediate feedback: Research shows that if you want to learn better, you need immediate feedback. Therefore, it is best to have the answers in hand when doing the questions. I have them all in the world. After each question, review the answers and self-examine them. Practicing without feedback or with late feedback will only seriously hinder learning efficiency;
2. Question-sea tactics: Just as some people think that learning begins and ends in the classroom, some students also believe that most knowledge understanding comes from practice questions. Yes, you can always build a knowledge framework through question-based tactics, but the process is slow and inefficient.
Exercise questions should highlight areas of knowledge where you need to develop better intuition. Some techniques, such as the Feynman Technique which I will talk about (the Feynman technique), which is quite effective for this. For non-technical subjects, it's more about mastering concepts than solving problems, so you'll often only need to complete a minimum number of exercises. For these subjects, you would be better off spending more time in Stage 3, developing subject insights.
The real question should be a bunch of signboards
There are two conclusions from the above discussion: one is that you must have an answer to the questions, and if you don’t have the answer, don’t do it; the other is that the purpose of doing the questions is to clarify your learning direction, not the question itself.
So, the real sea of questions should be a bunch of signboards. You only need to follow the direction pointed out by each question to learn Beer Bang.
In other words, every time you make a mistake on a question, you have to learn something, and then after completing the corresponding exercises for this study, decide the new learning direction again based on the results of the exercises.
How to use it correctly when studyingWhat about "Tihai Tactics"?
After explaining the first point clearly, we will find that the question sea tactic should be a very personal and efficient learning strategy, and may even be the best learning path. Sure enough, there is a reason why Asians, who are learning enthusiasts, love it so much.
So how to use it correctly during personal studyWhat about "Tihai Tactics"?
This is it"Corrective learning" is what needs to be done.
"Corrective learning" does not advocate learners to explore the correct world - it is interest-based learning. What it wants to do is to find a systematic set of questions for learners to experience in order to achieve the purpose of learning.
In other words,The most important thing about "error-corrective learning" type of learning is that you have to find the "correct error" first, and the most important thing about question sea tactics is that you have to find the correct sea.
So, how do we judge when we study aloneWhat about "There is a sea of good questions ahead"?
1. The question set must have a clear goal
WhatLet’s not even mention the illusory goal of “increasing reading scores”. The correct goal should look like this: the shortest path traverses all reading difficulties.
2. There is an implicit logic between the questions to achieve the goal of the question set
So don’t follow the set of questions. Each set of questions is about the same difficulty. How can we improve? There is no logic at all! When you get the question set, you should be able to see that the questions are divided into categories and have different levels of difficulty.
3. You must have standard answers and detailed explanations.
Otherwise, how would we know what the next knowledge point to learn is!
Attached original text link:
